Connecticut

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Connecticut

Post by clubgop » Wed Jan 02, 2019 5:06 pm

heydaralon wrote:
Tue Jan 01, 2019 7:21 pm
clubgop wrote:
Tue Jan 01, 2019 6:16 pm
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Tue Jan 01, 2019 3:26 pm
The TCNs in Saudi Arabia were treated like slaves. If you did to a human being what they do to TCNs, the government would lock you up for years for human trafficking and slavery, not to mention the torture and rape.

You as an American cannot do that anywhere at all without facing prison. Those people are not immigrants.
Maybe not quite as bad in Qatar but it is made clear you will never be a citizen, you sure as hell wont marry.
Saudiarrhea Arape-ia and Shitar do have some filipino indentured servant hotties that are quite beautiful and willing to clean your gold fountains though.
Yes, very many of them also have relatives in the states, buy the hype and think these places are better. They find out not so much.

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Connecticut

Post by Zlaxer » Fri Sep 13, 2019 5:50 am

Fuck this state.

https://www.courant.com/politics/hc-pol ... story.html
Republican legislators Thursday blasted the 7.35 percent tax on “food for immediate consumption” that was included as part of the state budget passed in June.
Fucking piece of shit democrats - they tried to get a pure grocery tax which caused an uproar, then they pushed a tax just for restaurants, only to change the wording to food "ready for immediate consumption" - State tax board released list yesterday of all foods "meeting" that definition and its all fucking groceries.

Fuck these looting leaches.

My grocery bill is going up 7.5% on top of the mill rate increases and all the other fucking taxes - Wife and I getting off this sinking ship in next opportunity to move for work.

Ph64
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:34 pm

Re: Connecticut

Post by Ph64 » Sat Sep 14, 2019 1:37 am

Why TF 7.5% when sales tax is 6.35%?
I'll pay less tax buying a cheap plastic trinket for a kid than for a hot dog? :evil:

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14790
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Connecticut

Post by The Conservative » Sat Sep 14, 2019 4:50 am

Ph64 wrote:
Sat Sep 14, 2019 1:37 am
Why TF 7.5% when sales tax is 6.35%?
I'll pay less tax buying a cheap plastic trinket for a kid than for a hot dog? :evil:
Hey, vote Democrat and you'll see less money. Why is that such a shocker? It's not like they hide this fact?

Hell, Mass is a perfect example. We had a vote (the people) to reduce our tax rate to 5.0 almost a decade ago.

Instead, the reps here ignored the ballot results and have kept the taxes at 6.25. With a threat of increasing them more because their pet projects aren't making money.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Connecticut

Post by Fife » Sat Sep 14, 2019 5:00 am

Ph64 wrote:
Sat Sep 14, 2019 1:37 am
Why TF 7.5% when sales tax is 6.35%?
I'll pay less tax buying a cheap plastic trinket for a kid than for a hot dog? :evil:
Inelasticity of demand. When the government is let off the chain, they tax the shit out of the stuff people will buy under almost any circumstances and in the most regressive way possible.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Connecticut

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Sep 14, 2019 6:41 am

Sales taxes on food are evil. Weird how republicans do not make a national issue out of what kind of shit heads would tax food, further driving poor people into poverty. Oh wait..

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14790
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Connecticut

Post by The Conservative » Sat Sep 14, 2019 6:43 am

Fife wrote:
Sat Sep 14, 2019 5:00 am
Ph64 wrote:
Sat Sep 14, 2019 1:37 am
Why TF 7.5% when sales tax is 6.35%?
I'll pay less tax buying a cheap plastic trinket for a kid than for a hot dog? :evil:
Inelasticity of demand. When the government is let off the chain, they tax the shit out of the stuff people will buy under almost any circumstances and in the most regressive way possible.
Have you ever noticed, when we talk about ”governments out of control” people refuse to put a party behind it?

Look at the biggest shitholes out there in the US.

Let's call it what it is. When the democrat party is allowed off the hooks shit like this happens.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Connecticut

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Sep 14, 2019 6:44 am

Mostly republicans do this shit.


Image

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14790
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Connecticut

Post by The Conservative » Sat Sep 14, 2019 6:46 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Sat Sep 14, 2019 6:41 am
Sales taxes on food are evil. Weird how republicans do not make a national issue out of what kind of shit heads would tax food, further driving poor people into poverty. Oh wait..
I have no issue on getting taxed on what you buy. I have an issue on getting taxed then taxed again on money already taxed.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Connecticut

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Sep 14, 2019 6:47 am

Thirty-two states and the District of Columbia exempt most food purchased for consumption at home from the state sales tax. West Virginia is the state that most recently eliminated its sales tax on food (effective July 1, 2013).

Six states tax groceries at lower rates than other goods; they are Arkansas, Illinois, Missouri, Tennessee, Utah, and Virginia.[1]

Four states — Hawaii, Idaho, Kansas, and Oklahoma — tax groceries fully but offer credits or rebates offsetting some of the taxes paid on food by some portions of the population.[2] These credits or rebates usually are set at a flat amount per family member. The amounts and eligibility rules vary, but may be too narrow and/or insufficient to give eligible households full relief from sales taxes paid on food purchases.

Three states continue to apply their sales tax fully to food purchased for home consumption without providing any offsetting relief for low- and moderate-income families. They are Alabama, Mississippi, and South Dakota.[3]
https://www.cbpp.org/research/state-bud ... on-in-2017