I know you wish I would do that, but I'm not montegriffo who goes running to the moderator or Hash when I don't like someone's posting behavior. That is the behavior of cowards.Kath wrote:I really wish you'd just ask Martin to fire me. It's truly horrible that you are knowingly keeping my authoritarian overreach from Martin. It's like harboring a criminal. Shame, shame, shame - if only you had more respect for Martin and the rule of law. But do you? No - you don't want me fired, you just want to bitch about how I'm not fired, yet.StCapps wrote:[ That's serious enough to warrant considering whether Kath should continue as moderator.
Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
*yip*
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Let's roll the tape, shall we? You were pretty clear from the get go that you wouldn't allow an Olympic thread.StCapps wrote: If you had just asked nicely, I would have stopped posting hockey talk in your precious thread, but you had to threaten to abuse your powers as moderator instead, so now you shall be given no quarter. Your repeated insistence that simply asking me to stop is what triggered me, that is completely incorrect.
StCapps wrote:So naive.Kath wrote:Oh well - was hoping this thread could be more than a hate on the Olympics thread because hockey, but whatever...
Kath wrote:I suppose we could start a thread for each sport... but I imagine you'd both find a way to make the bobsledding thread about hockey.StCapps wrote:So naive.Kath wrote:Oh well - was hoping this thread could be more than a hate on the Olympics thread because hockey, but whatever...
StCapps wrote:Every thread is a hockey thread, to Canadians anyway.Kath wrote:I suppose we could start a thread for each sport... but I imagine you'd both find a way to make the bobsledding thread about hockey.StCapps wrote:So naive.
Gold Medal In The Face, That's Who's There. Red and White. Deal With It.
/shurgs
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
I was exaggerating for comedic effect. Gold medal in the face, is a dead giveaway. You just got impatient and overreacted, thinking I was dead serious, and then you declared war over it, with threats of censorship, so now you have your war, enjoy.Kath wrote:Let's roll the tape, shall we? You were pretty clear from the get go that you wouldn't allow an Olympic thread.StCapps wrote: If you had just asked nicely, I would have stopped posting hockey talk in your precious thread, but you had to threaten to abuse your powers as moderator instead, so now you shall be given no quarter. Your repeated insistence that simply asking me to stop is what triggered me, that is completely incorrect.
StCapps wrote:So naive.Kath wrote:Oh well - was hoping this thread could be more than a hate on the Olympics thread because hockey, but whatever...Kath wrote:I suppose we could start a thread for each sport... but I imagine you'd both find a way to make the bobsledding thread about hockey.StCapps wrote:So naive.StCapps wrote:Every thread is a hockey thread, to Canadians anyway.Kath wrote: I suppose we could start a thread for each sport... but I imagine you'd both find a way to make the bobsledding thread about hockey.
Gold Medal In The Face, That's Who's There. Red and White. Deal With It.
/shurgs
Y'all can blame me all you want, but this is Kath's fault. I didn't threaten censorship because I didn't like someone's posts, she did. Even if she was just joking like I was, threatening censorship as a moderator, will automatically cause appropriate retaliation will ensue, because I don't take kindly to threats of censorship, especially if you are specifically targeting hockey talk with those threats.
Last edited by StCapps on Thu Feb 08, 2018 12:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
The only one playing war is you, and I'm thoroughly enjoying watching you make a total jackass out of yourself as you continue to prove you are not here for anything except trolling.StCapps wrote: so now you have your war, enjoy.
Enjoy your war.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
StCapps wrote:Any censorship of human forum members who aren't
posting porn is too much.
That's what you fail to understand, this forum is pro-free speech, you refuse to allow that in selective fashion.
There should not be a rule against graphic pedophile jokes,
and if you are going to have one, at least enforce it consistently instead of only when you feel like it.
I can't believe this thread is still going. Reaching a low-point indeed, for the MHF.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
You declared war and are now bitching out, you should have known that is what your were doing by threatening hockey talk with censorship, if you didn't, then you are just dumb. That's crossing the line, war were declared, too late to call me off now, until adequate retaliation has been dished out. You should have know better Kath, it's really that simple.Kath wrote:The only one playing war is you, and I'm thoroughly enjoying watching you make a total jackass out of yourself as you continue to prove you are not here for anything except trolling.StCapps wrote: so now you have your war, enjoy.
Enjoy your war.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
He's really lost it. I wonder if he has any hair left? I've never seen him this mad. I like the part where he was totally kidding about his planning to be a giant douche bag during the Olympics. Like we don't have hundreds of examples of him spamming threads, already, as a basis to believe him when he threatens to spam threads.GrumpyCatFace wrote:
I can't believe this thread is still going. Reaching a low-point indeed, for the MHF.
He was going to spam them anyway, he always does, so his all "I said I was but I wasn't but now I am," rings totally hollow. Such BS.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Not mad at all, your actions simply require a proper retaliation and you are mistaking that for anger.Kath wrote:I've never seen him this mad.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Like I said, impatient and paranoid.Kath wrote:He was going to spam them anyway, he always does, so his all "I said I was but I wasn't but now I am," rings totally hollow. Such BS.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
You threatened to do something you do on the regular and I was supposed to believe you weren't serious? C'mon - you take us all for chumps, but you are the douche bag, here, not me.StCapps wrote:Like I said, impatient and paranoid.Kath wrote:He was going to spam them anyway, he always does, so his all "I said I was but I wasn't but now I am," rings totally hollow. Such BS.
Anyway, I had no intention whatsoever of removing your posts. I got carried away in the moment. I had an actual plan; it was going to be funny - but I wasn't going to touch your words or delete your posts. Forget it, now. The only one who will look like a douche is you, if you spam threads with hundreds of unrelated posts.
Account abandoned.