Oh, I used to play Monopoly as a kid. See, it's this game designed to model capitalism. We played it a lot in California, funny it didn't make it to Washington.DBTrek wrote:Number of times in human history one person has owned everything: 0
Sounds like a completely unproven mathematical certainty.
It's Happening.
-
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: It's Happening.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: It's Happening.
The “mathematical certainty” of a four player Monopoly board game applied to global economics.
Amazed more people haven’t been converted to this obviously correct worldview.
Amazed more people haven’t been converted to this obviously correct worldview.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: It's Happening.
Your solution is the lazy one, and your excuse is that those who have power are being lazy too? Step your game up Hash, that's a lame argument. Try a less lazy solution, then maybe you'll gain some traction around here rather than reaching for what should be the last resort, as your first resort.Martin Hash wrote:Well, they just must not be trying hard enough, those lazy bastards. Whips. Debtors Prison. I'm sure we can come up with a solution.StCapps wrote:There are better ways for the other players to get their hands on money than wealth redistribution, protip.Martin Hash wrote:That's a mathematical certainty, the same one I'm always talking about: compounding gains. Allow it to go on long enough, and 1 person owns everything. That's how Monopoly ends. However, if you want to keep Monopoly going, other players are going to have to be given money somehow.
Last edited by StCapps on Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: It's Happening.
Dude, simplification to fundamentals is my specialty. Confuse life in complexity if you want, everybody else does.DBTrek wrote:The “mathematical certainty” of a four player Monopoly board game applied to global economics.
Amazed more people haven’t been converted to this obviously correct worldview.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: It's Happening.
I said my solution: your turn.StCapps wrote:Your solution is the lazy one, and your excuse is that those who have power are being lazy too? Step your game up Hash, that's a lame argument.Martin Hash wrote:Well, they just must not be trying hard enough, those lazy bastards. Whips. Debtors Prison. I'm sure we can come up with a solution.StCapps wrote:There are better ways for the other players to get their hands on money than wealth redistribution, protip.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: It's Happening.
In a world with only one market (houses/hotel) and a finite cash drawer, I’m sure your mathematical certainties play out (aka someone will eventually win the game).
Of course, even with this extremely limited model you fail to address what happens one turn after the win is achieved. Or does time also stop in the real world, according to your mathematical certainty?
Of course, even with this extremely limited model you fail to address what happens one turn after the win is achieved. Or does time also stop in the real world, according to your mathematical certainty?
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: It's Happening.
Well my solution is to increase the ability of those at the bottom to rise to the top, instead capping how much wealth the top can have. That is a way better solution, wealth redistribution should be used sparingly, it should not be the go to option. If you want to reduce the influence of the aristocracy, that's how you do it, wealth redistribution is the least efficient method of accomplishing your goal.Martin Hash wrote:I said my solution: your turn.StCapps wrote:Your solution is the lazy one, and your excuse is that those who have power are being lazy too? Step your game up Hash, that's a lame argument.Martin Hash wrote: Well, they just must not be trying hard enough, those lazy bastards. Whips. Debtors Prison. I'm sure we can come up with a solution.
Last edited by StCapps on Wed Feb 14, 2018 2:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: It's Happening.
I've heard suggestions that we mandate the max gap between the guy at the top versus the guy at the bottom. It's pretty convoluted, now. Is there any merit in mandating the max of that gap? My general inclination is that it's a bad idea, but I agree that the wealth gap is damn close to 1929 levels.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: It's Happening.
I read some words. Gimme something...StCapps wrote:Well my solution is to increase the ability of those at the bottom to rise to the top, instead capping how much wealth the top can have. That is a way better solution, wealth redistribution should be used sparingly, it should not be the go to option.Martin Hash wrote:I said my solution: your turn.StCapps wrote:Your solution is the lazy one, and your excuse is that those who have power are being lazy too? Step your game up Hash, that's a lame argument.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: It's Happening.
If we’re just handing our money to everyone after each Monopoly turn, I’m not building shit.
Why would I?
Bust my ass to make money I have to give away, or relax and simply accrue money. Hmmm. Tough call.
Why would I?
Bust my ass to make money I have to give away, or relax and simply accrue money. Hmmm. Tough call.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"