So then we agree that the law is not being followed or prosecuted - except domestically.Zlaxer wrote: ↑Thu Jun 14, 2018 11:20 amNo - because if the law was followed - China's shit would be seized by an ITC order at the port of entry...and POTUS would slap them silly with tariffs or embargos....If they want to throw sand in our sand box - we kick them out of the sand box...that fucking simple.....but money and corruption prevents this.SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Thu Jun 14, 2018 11:16 amWell, if China’s not going to be prosecuted, then it does render the existing laws an undue hinderance on domestic companies...
Bayer acquires Monsanto
-
- Posts: 25273
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Bayer acquires Monsanto
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: Bayer acquires Monsanto
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Thu Jun 14, 2018 11:22 amSo then we agree that the law is not being followed or prosecuted - except domestically.Zlaxer wrote: ↑Thu Jun 14, 2018 11:20 amNo - because if the law was followed - China's shit would be seized by an ITC order at the port of entry...and POTUS would slap them silly with tariffs or embargos....If they want to throw sand in our sand box - we kick them out of the sand box...that fucking simple.....but money and corruption prevents this.SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Thu Jun 14, 2018 11:16 am
Well, if China’s not going to be prosecuted, then it does render the existing laws an undue hinderance on domestic companies...
It's barely followed domestically....and no - just because the system is fucking broken does not mean patents, in general, are bad.....read Madison's and Jefferson's letters....
-
- Posts: 1825
- Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:14 am
Re: Bayer acquires Monsanto
It's a really, really, truly horrible idea to give one company complete control over the food supply.
Why are all the Gods such vicious cunts? Where's the God of tits and wine?