Can the State Feed People? lulz

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Can the State Feed People? lulz

Post by Smitty-48 » Mon Mar 26, 2018 12:42 pm

It's like Virginia, the SJW's come to tear down the monument to Marse Robert, and not only do the white Virginians not care, they're all for it, that's what SA is like now.

If you ask a white person in SA who the Father of the Nation is, they're going to say "Mandela".
Nec Aspera Terrent

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Can the State Feed People? lulz

Post by Smitty-48 » Mon Mar 26, 2018 1:01 pm

If you loaded up on millions of white SA's, I bet you most of them would go to the southwest Red States, because they're not up for winter, and then they'd tip the balance to the Blue, it would be like Austin spreading out to take over, Texas would fall to the SJWs, Arizona would fall, 5 million Democrat party types, dumped into the desert behind Red lines, all at once, no gerrymandering would be able to stop them.
Nec Aspera Terrent

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Can the State Feed People? lulz

Post by Zlaxer » Mon Mar 26, 2018 1:36 pm

I'm with Smitty - They fucked up their own homeland - I don't want them doing the same to mine.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Can the State Feed People? lulz

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Mar 26, 2018 1:39 pm

It wasn't them that did it. It was the leftists in the rest of the Western World that embargoed them.

Everybody wanted to pretend like Nelson Mandela was this saintly little man (he wasn't).

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Can the State Feed People? lulz

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Mar 26, 2018 1:42 pm

As far as them bringing their mistakes here.. one could have said the same thing about most of the Cubans who escaped to Florida (people probably did make that very argument). How did that pan out?

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Can the State Feed People? lulz

Post by Zlaxer » Mon Mar 26, 2018 1:43 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:As far as them bringing their mistakes here.. one could have said the same thing about most of the Cubans who escaped to Florida (people probably did make that very argument). How did that pan out?

Cubans refugees arn't elitist white liberals....

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Can the State Feed People? lulz

Post by Zlaxer » Mon Mar 26, 2018 1:44 pm

You want to make that comparison.....then let the white south Africans experience their utopia for 10-20 years....then let them in here....

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Can the State Feed People? lulz

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Mar 26, 2018 1:45 pm

Zlaxer wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:As far as them bringing their mistakes here.. one could have said the same thing about most of the Cubans who escaped to Florida (people probably did make that very argument). How did that pan out?

Cubans refugees arn't elitist white liberals....
Most Cubans supported the communist revolution, including probably the majority of them who ended up fleeing here. They know what Marxism does. They don't fall for the democrats' song and dance.

Wait till the very end when the South African whites are facing imminent genocide. They will know the score.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Can the State Feed People? lulz

Post by Speaker to Animals » Mon Mar 26, 2018 1:45 pm

Zlaxer wrote:You want to make that comparison.....then let the white south Africans experience their utopia for 10-20 years....then let them in here....

They have a few years at most before the extermination.

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: Can the State Feed People? lulz

Post by Smitty-48 » Mon Mar 26, 2018 9:41 pm

South Africa was never embargoed, the South African economy was booming in 1990 when they ended Apartheid, highest GDP ever to that point, there was no economic pressure on them to end Apartheid, for all the leftist talk of boycotts, major western economies declined to boycott them, so that never had any impact, support for the policy collapsed because the majority of whites simply stopped supporting it, on grounds of morality, not economics.

The National Party was backed by Reagan, it was backed by Thatcher, the South Africans were a bulwark against the Soviets, they had huge support on the right in the US and UK in particular, they had diamonds, they had gold, they were a major arms exporter, they were making money hand over fist, just on the Krugerrand alone they were one of the most liquid countries on earth, cranking out a thousand metric tons of gold per year, nobody would boycott them because they were too rich, they had gold coming out of their ears, they never suffered economically because of Apartheid.

It was however the economic growth which basically doomed Apartheid, because as the economy grew and diversified, South Africa became increasingly urbanized, the whites moved to the big cities, and as they did, they became ever more cosmopolitan and liberalized, until support for Apartheid was basically just concentrated in the conservative rural areas, and they got outvoted by the big city liberals.

Really not that complex, the western liberal media and associated celebrity elites starting calling them fascists, and the by then majority liberal white population decided they could not be that, by 1990, Jim Crow was simply not morally acceptable anymore, even in South Africa.
Nec Aspera Terrent