Censorship is not the solution, you know this C-Mag. Time to fire the Censorship Cunt.C-Mag wrote:I've come to accept that discussion wanders off topic, and people will make off topic and off color jokes........ I do it myself.
But when individuals or people team up to intentionally trash a thread it's just sad. Just small people trying to assert dominance in an online forum. To do it once in a while as a joke is one thing, but when it no longer surprises others it's problematic.
Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
*yip*
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Wait, what? Is this why we have 2 threads for the Olympics? Wait, not I only see one, and it's named something about special snowflakes. WTF happened to the other thread that was here earlier this morning? So much for Free Speech Space.
When did Kath become a moderator? It's Martin's site, so it's his call. Personally, I have some concerns about Kath being completely objective given her posting history. No, it's not because I think she is a liberal, but Kath has taken things the wrong way on a number of occasions (at least 1 with me) and goes into bunker mentality once she "feelz" that way. If she wants to be that way as a poster, I don't care, but moderators needs to be able to keep their emotions out of their moderation. Seeing memes posted in this thread by said moderator is not inspiring confidence.
When did Kath become a moderator? It's Martin's site, so it's his call. Personally, I have some concerns about Kath being completely objective given her posting history. No, it's not because I think she is a liberal, but Kath has taken things the wrong way on a number of occasions (at least 1 with me) and goes into bunker mentality once she "feelz" that way. If she wants to be that way as a poster, I don't care, but moderators needs to be able to keep their emotions out of their moderation. Seeing memes posted in this thread by said moderator is not inspiring confidence.
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Challenging anyone to point to a single instance of me editing their posts because I didn't like the content.
(Exception is calling someone a child fucker; yeah, I edit those words out.)
(Exception is calling someone a child fucker; yeah, I edit those words out.)
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Any exceptions are unacceptable Censorship Cunt. Just quit ieady, you are not cut out for this job.Kath wrote:Challenging anyone to point to a single instance of me editing their posts because I didn't like the content.
(Exception is calling someone a child fucker; yeah, I edit those words out.)
Last edited by StCapps on Tue Feb 06, 2018 12:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
That's the point; Capps doesn't want an Olympic discussion thread, so he's been spamming them before the Olympics start, promising that he won't allow discussion of Olympics without us having to scroll through pages of his ranting about professional hockey.PartyOf5 wrote:Wait, what? Is this why we have 2 threads for the Olympics? Wait, not I only see one, and it's named something about special snowflakes. WTF happened to the other thread that was here earlier this morning? So much for Free Speech Space.
I
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
gettin some serious Jim Acosta vibes from this thread
"the Kath administration is censoring our free speech as I continue to use my free speech to criticize her censoring my free speech"
meh
"the Kath administration is censoring our free speech as I continue to use my free speech to criticize her censoring my free speech"
meh
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
I never do anything without an okie dokie from Martin. He's in charge. Believe me, I've asked to do some funny shit to some of you. He has your back and I respect his wishes.
Deal with it. He can fire me anytime he wants.
Deal with it. He can fire me anytime he wants.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
I want an Olympics discussion thread, you're the one who doesn't, hence the need for a safe space, so you don't have to scroll past any posts in your precious thread, because you're a lazy Censorship Cunt.Kath wrote:That's the point; Capps doesn't want an Olympic discussion thread, so he's been spamming them before the Olympics start, promising that he won't allow discussion of Olympics without us having to scroll through pages of his ranting about professional hockey.
Last edited by StCapps on Tue Feb 06, 2018 12:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Fuck Hash too then, he's not pro-Liberty, he just likes to front like he is. Censoring insults is really fucking gay, how do you let whinny little bitches like monte convince you otherwise, that's beyond me. Can't make any pedophile jokes, Kath will shut you down like the Censorship Cunt that she is and Fake Liberty Nation Man will okay it.Kath wrote:I never do anything without an okie dokie from Martin. He's in charge. Believe me, I've asked to do some funny shit to some of you. He has your back and I respect his wishes.
Deal with it. He can fire me anytime he wants.
Last edited by StCapps on Tue Feb 06, 2018 12:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
StCapps wrote:Censorship is not the solution, you know this C-Mag. Time to fire the Censorship Cunt.C-Mag wrote:I've come to accept that discussion wanders off topic, and people will make off topic and off color jokes........ I do it myself.
But when individuals or people team up to intentionally trash a thread it's just sad. Just small people trying to assert dominance in an online forum. To do it once in a while as a joke is one thing, but when it no longer surprises others it's problematic.
Not talking about censorship. ....... just a little mutual respect amongst the group. We're a dysfunctional family here. Some of us have been together for a decade, went through a lot of ups and together . There's value in that, even if your views are 180 out from the other person.
Heck, I'm an asshole, I know that and it comes out in posts. This is a free speech free fire zone, and I love that. Let's not fuck up the fun by being petty.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience