His Name Was Seth Rich

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: His Name Was Seth Rich

Post by TheReal_ND » Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:26 pm

clubgop wrote:
ssu wrote:
C-Mag wrote:1. Seth Rich was murdered by robbers who forgot to take anything from him
2. Seth Rich was murdered because he suspected Bernie was being cheated by the DNC.
3. Seth Rich coincindentally died and the Clinton Clan had nothing to do with.

Take your pick
Police were alerted to gunfire at 4:20 a.m. by an automated gunfire locator.Within approximately one minute after the gun shots, police officers found Rich with multiple gunshot wounds, in a conscious and breathing state. He was transported to a nearby hospital, where he later died.
Hm... wonder why would a robber decide instantantly flee the scene without going through the pockets of your victim?

And wouldn't the Hillary's illuminati-assassins take the wallet to make it look as a robbery gone wrong???

Yeah, take your pick... :?
But no one saw anything? No physical evidence? How does a botched robbery become the perfect murder?
There is cc footage of it. I was posting about it somewhere... I think maybe in the fake news thread hang on

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: His Name Was Seth Rich

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:30 pm

A thought occurred to me for a contract idea..

What if a city had little airship drones that could basically stay up in the air for days at a time with sensors that would detect a gunshot and automatically target the area with surveillance footage?

Would that be a fourth amendment violation even in a neighborhood if the cameras only run when it detects a gunshot?

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18720
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: His Name Was Seth Rich

Post by Martin Hash » Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:31 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:A thought occurred to me for a contract idea..

What if a city had little airship drones that could basically stay up in the air for days at a time with sensors that would detect a gunshot and automatically target the area with surveillance footage?

Would that be a fourth amendment violation even in a neighborhood if the cameras only run when it detects a gunshot?
We lost the Forth by not exercising it.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: His Name Was Seth Rich

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:34 pm

Martin Hash wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:A thought occurred to me for a contract idea..

What if a city had little airship drones that could basically stay up in the air for days at a time with sensors that would detect a gunshot and automatically target the area with surveillance footage?

Would that be a fourth amendment violation even in a neighborhood if the cameras only run when it detects a gunshot?
We lost the Forth by not exercising it.

I am curious if that would pass legal challenges. It's not that difficult to design something like that. It would be trivial to make a prototype and patent it.

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: His Name Was Seth Rich

Post by TheReal_ND » Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:36 pm


User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18720
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: His Name Was Seth Rich

Post by Martin Hash » Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:38 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Martin Hash wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:A thought occurred to me for a contract idea..

What if a city had little airship drones that could basically stay up in the air for days at a time with sensors that would detect a gunshot and automatically target the area with surveillance footage?

Would that be a fourth amendment violation even in a neighborhood if the cameras only run when it detects a gunshot?
We lost the Forth by not exercising it.

I am curious if that would pass legal challenges. It's not that difficult to design something like that. It would be trivial to make a prototype and patent it.
Surveillance of a public place, sure, it would pass muster. It's cops getting personal information off our computers that totally crossed the line.

p.s. There's an interesting case of cops looking through people's walls with infrared cameras (for real, man) that got crushed in The Courts.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: His Name Was Seth Rich

Post by TheReal_ND » Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:39 pm

Basicaly tldr iirc: they did obtain footage and police claimed they saw figures but it was a bad shot and never released it to anybody. Some autists started digging into the ownership of the CCTV companies and found shady connections and were either attempting to retrieve the footage themselves and/or find legal precedents

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: His Name Was Seth Rich

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:40 pm

What do you think are the odds of being able to sell that to a city government like Chicago if you could sell them for under $1000 per unit and the control center could be run on relatively cheap hardware?

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: His Name Was Seth Rich

Post by TheReal_ND » Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:51 pm

Iirc shop owners are offered them for free in many cases. I can't remember what the deal is, like there is a way for shop owners to even subsidize them or something. Trying to sell it to a city like Chicago? Yeah it could work if they wanted to do a hard right on the crime problem like New York did and perhaps even start enforcing stop and frisk like New York did. I doubt they have the heart for that though.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: His Name Was Seth Rich

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sun Jul 09, 2017 6:57 pm

Basically you'd need to build little airship platforms that could autonomously hover around high-crime areas (at high enough altitude to not bother anybody). They need sensors that listen for gun shots. As long as you have more than three, you'd probably be able to locate the position of the gunshot pretty fast. They could instantly train cameras on the location. Ideally the cameras would have IR for nighttime surveillance and also the ability to read license plates and take decent shots of faces. As soon as this happens they would alert the servers. The servers would alert dispatch. Dispatch could send officers to that location. If their squad cars have the ability, you might even be able to forward images of the suspects directly to the car as well as real-time footage of the scene.

That's just some kind of sensor that listens for gunshots, a microcontroller, and little airship drone to mount this stuff on, and a wireless connection (i.e. 4G). Really, you could do most of the processing at the server level.