BjornP wrote:Can't really speak to wether or not US youth's work ethic is worsening, not being American, but the logic that you can only apply the old Protestant work ethic to hard/manual labor jobs needs abit of explaining. Either your work ethic applies to all work sectors, or you don't have a work ethic. My brother made co-owner of a small, but succesful tech firm last year. It's not hard physical labor, but he didn't get to his post by just sitting around watching YT vids.
If hard manual labor jobs are disappearing, a work ethic is only going to disappear along with it, if all employers from all job sectors start not giving a damn about the level of effort their employees invest in the workplace. I can't really see that happening anywhere in the world.
Bjorne, the theory being presented here is that the loss of low skill jobs makes people ill suited for the higher skill jobs even if they learn the skills. The benefit of manual labor jobs was that you don't need deep skills to do many of them. So a high school student could get a manual labor job, learn to work hard at a young age, then later complete college and go on to work hard at a high skill job. What is being suggested here is that the lack of demanding low skill jobs will mean that by the time someone learns higher skills they will have missed some essential developmental window to learn a strong work ethic. To look at your brother's case, did he engage in demanding work while in high school and college before getting the opportunity to do the kind of work he does now? Or was he allowed to do what he wanted through most of high school and college until he had high end skills to enter the workforce? The question presented is whether it is POSSIBLE for someone whose first job is a highly skilled position they get after years of education to be able to exhibit what was once a normative work ethic. I'd say that determining the accuracy and ubiquity of apeman's anecdote is precisely the question for this thread:
apeman wrote:All this is true. I grew up middle class, white collar worker area in CT. I was one of the only kids in my class with a paper route, one of the only who cut laws, etc.
I banged nails framing houses during summers in college despite being a top nerd, everyone thought it was weird and that I should have some useless unpaid internship instead.
As a ski bum for 3 winters tahoe, I held like 20 jobs and learned how hard it is to scrape by.
So when I finally went to law school -- where you are directly competing with the other students for the all-important class rank -- how could these soft, whiny, wimpy, excuse-making, trust fundy kids who never held a real job possibly out-compete me? They couldn't.
In fact, my fellow students still complain daily on facebook about how unfair life is, yet I still see no evidence of them ever having gotten their hands dirty, or even over come a single professional hardship. They are over-educated professional losers.
Does working jobs like apeman did make him more likely to succeed in college, and later in the workforce? Is there any data on this we can locate? If I tell a high school or college student to just focus on getting good grades rather than picking up jobs wherever they can am I sabotaging their ability to be successful? Is it becoming harder for these students to find such jobs? I do think that the demand for low skill jobs in our economy is shrinking, and can be expected to continue shrinking as robotics and AI become better and cheaper. The day is it cheaper for McDonalds to install a burger making machine than to pay staff, those jobs will disappear forever. Paper routes will die with the newspapers. Lawn mowing will be done by automated machines. Will these jobs still exist, and will their lack undermine our ability to staff the highly skilled professional jobs of the future?
And of course there is the ever looming question of whether everyone will be able to do such jobs, and if not what we will do with the no longer necessary workers. Until the Great Depression, the length of the workday shrank at a continual rate. People used to work 12+ hour days 7 days a week. Then it dropped to 6 days a week, and eventually to 5. Day length dropped to 10 hours, then to 8. What does the future bring? Will we all work 6 hour days 4 days a week? Will some of us work while the rest seek a patron? For those who will need to work to maintain the machinery everyone else depends on, what will cause those people to have the motivation to do what they do? Luxury? Power? A sense of self achievement and adventure? The world is changing, and just as people several hundred years ago would be unable to recognize modern life we will be unable to recognize what is coming. But thinking about it will help us make it happen.