Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

[StCapps]

man you really worry about some seriously small time gnats.

I've edited 1 out of every 38,571 posts - ZOMG, the sky is falling!

via Imgflip Meme Generator

Any censorship of human forum members who aren't posting porn is too much. That's what you fail to understand, this forum is pro-free speech, you refuse to allow that in selective fashion. There should not be a rule against graphic pedophile jokes, and if you are going to have one, at least enforce it consistently instead of only when you feel like it.

[DrYouth]

Any censorship of human forum members who aren't posting porn is too much. That's what you fail to understand, this forum is pro-free speech, you refuse to allow that in selective fashion. There should not be a rule against graphic pedophile jokes, and if you are going to have one, at least enforce it consistently instead of only when you feel like it.

Your point is heard...

And to Capps.

Please refrain from gratuitously disrupting thread topics.
And from creating whiny threads about relatively minor moderator interventions...

In other words get back to us if you have a more serious moderator complaint.

[StCapps]

Any censorship of human forum members who aren't posting porn is too much. That's what you fail to understand, this forum is pro-free speech, you refuse to allow that in selective fashion. There should not be a rule against graphic pedophile jokes, and if you are going to have one, at least enforce it consistently instead of only when you feel like it.

Your point is heard...

And to Capps.

Please refrain from gratuitously disrupting thread topics.
And from creating whiny threads about relatively minor moderator interventions...

In other words get back to us if you have a more serious moderator complaint.

Censorship isn't serious enough on a forum that espouses to be pro-free speech? That's serious enough to warrant considering whether Kath should continue as moderator, if you don't care about censorship, and don't find it to be an important complaint regarding moderator activity, that's on you

[K@th]

[
Please refrain from gratuitously disrupting thread topics.

Great. Now you've done it. He's going to triple down on his douche baggery now.

[StCapps]

[
Please refrain from gratuitously disrupting thread topics.

Great. Now you've done it. He's going to triple down on his douche baggery now.

Nah, I only do that when censorship is threatened. If you had just asked nicely, I would have stopped posting hockey talk in your precious thread, but you had to threaten to abuse your powers as moderator instead, so now you shall be given no quarter. Your repeated insistence that simply asking me to stop is what triggered me, that is completely incorrect.

[DrYouth]

Great. Now you've done it. He's going to triple down on his douche baggery now.

He will if he's a douche bag...
That would prove the point.

[K@th]

[ That's serious enough to warrant considering whether Kath should continue as moderator.

I really wish you'd just ask Martin to fire me. It's truly horrible that you are knowingly keeping my authoritarian overreach from Martin. It's like harboring a criminal. Shame, shame, shame - if only you had more respect for Martin and the rule of law. But do you? No - you don't want me fired, you just want to bitch about how I'm not fired, yet.

[DrYouth]

If Kath threatens more censorship... that would prove Capps point.

[StCapps]

If Kath threatens more censorship... that would prove Capps point.

Threatening to abuse her moderator powers, even once deserves adequate retaliation, I'm just getting warmed up. Being a douche bag or not is completely irrelevant.

[DrYouth]

Threatening to abuse her moderator powers, even once deserves adequate retaliation, I'm just getting warmed up.

[popcorn]