Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

[DrYouth]

by removing a few ultra descriptive words about how a forum member uses his genitals to penetrate children.

lol

Four posts, that's an extensive history. You don't like clubby, you only censor you enemies, never your friends. Fuck your selective enforcement bullshit.

The new evidence is four example of censoring the details of child fucking...
OK - we are all adults here - no need for the censorship of child penetration - 1 more point against Kath

3-4

[StCapps]

The new evidence is four example of censoring the details of child fucking...
OK - we are all adults here - no need for the censorship of child penetration - 1 more point against Kath

3-4

That's Capps 1 - Kath 3.
She's getting murdered on this, she is the one in the wrong, not I.

All I did was not immediately respect her wishes as quickly as she desired, and she completely overreacted out of paranoia.

Liberty > Good Manners.
Those who can't see that, whatever, you suck.

[Montegriffo]

The new evidence is four example of censoring the details of child fucking...
OK - we are all adults here - no need for the censorship of child penetration - 1 more point against Kath 3-4

False accusations against a forum member not just moderation of graphic child penetration language.

[DrYouth]

Capps is a serial off topic poster and didn't respond to reasonable requests to cease and desist.
Very annoying behaviour.... but short of censorship.

Kath censored 4 child fucking references according to the evidence posted here.... and threatened to censor Capps.
Arguably-excessive moderation... relatively minor infractions... but we score points against Kath here... we don't like censorship.

Then Capps starts a thread to defame said moderator.
Most importantly no accountability taken for his own actions.
Total overkill and extreme whininess for the LOSE.


The ruling is
3-4 against Cappy and I say that's generous towards him.

[StCapps]

False accusations do not warrant censorship, stop trying to justify it monte, it's unjustifiable. You are just a whinny little bitch.

[StCapps]

Then Capps starts a thread to defame said moderator.
Total overkill and extreme whininess for the LOSE.

She is the one who went overkill. Rudeness is not worse than censorship, your score keeping is straight up retarded.
Liberty > Good Manners

[K@th]

OK - we are all adults here - no need for the censorship of child penetration - 1 more point against Kath

3-4

Yeah, it's totally cool to accuse someone of getting their dick hard so they can ram it into a baby's ass. Clubby is all over the forum making accusations of child fucking. All completely uncensored, because that's just Clubby doing his thing. Maybe next time the asshole could belong to an 18-year old?

Like I said, Martin can fire me for removing those words. He knows how.

[Montegriffo]

False accusations do not warrant censorship, stop trying to justify it monte, it's unjustifiable. You are just a whinny little bitch.

Ad Hom, re-fills glass.

[StCapps]

OK - we are all adults here - no need for the censorship of child penetration - 1 more point against Kath

3-4

Yeah, it's totally cool to accuse someone of getting their dick hard so they can ram it into a baby's ass. Clubby is all over the forum making accusations of child fucking. All completely uncensored, because that's just Clubby doing his thing. Maybe next time the asshole could belong to an 18-year old?

Like I said, Martin can fire me for removing those words. He knows how.

Kath fucks children asses with her strapon, she loves that prepubescent ass. Uh-oh! Descriptive and graphic language, better censor me.

Fucking loser.

[DrYouth]

Rudeness is not worse than censorship, your score keeping is straight up retarded.

Well your own poll shows that others on the forum aren't great fans of rudeness.

Maybe a little lesson learned...

Taken down by your own poll... lol