Habbening Thread
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: Habbening Thread
Radical Islam has publicly stated their mission is to infiltrate the west through the refugee flow. They have had successes. Those opposed have said this is a bad policy, unless you want to destroy the west. No one defending mass migration has addressed that fact. They state it is a myth, even after numerous attacks. Even after Merkel admitted that radicals were entering with refugees.
They say it's fake, not happening, and not worthy of response, after countless examples of it being true.
That's the bullshit being challenged. It isn't up for debate that violent Muslims are intent on killing westerners. It's happening daily. Flail all you like, reality contradicts you.
Defend your stance that accepting countless violent extremists is a defensible plan. Stop dodging it.
They say it's fake, not happening, and not worthy of response, after countless examples of it being true.
That's the bullshit being challenged. It isn't up for debate that violent Muslims are intent on killing westerners. It's happening daily. Flail all you like, reality contradicts you.
Defend your stance that accepting countless violent extremists is a defensible plan. Stop dodging it.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Habbening Thread
No. I'm pro Muslim immigration. They have good values. Westerners are degenerate Juggalo butt holes. Fuck them tbh. At least Muslims have a fucking code of decency.
-
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Re: Habbening Thread
And how many in this thread have defended unrestricted mass migration, especially of violent extremists? Is Merkel a MHF poster? Has Monte voiced the opinion that Islam is a religion of peace somewhere? He replied to StA that the presented threat to British culture is overblown. That's not a denial of a *security* threat.Those opposed have said this is a bad policy, unless you want to destroy the west. No one defending mass migration has addressed that fact..
Terrorism is crime. Treating a few hundred or even thousand deaths like the imminent end of civilisation, is what pearl clutching hysterics do.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: Habbening Thread
Patriot Act.BjornP wrote:And how many in this thread have defended unrestricted mass migration, especially of violent extremists? Is Merkel a MHF poster? Has Monte voiced the opinion that Islam is a religion of peace somewhere? He replied to StA that the presented threat to British culture is overblown. That's not a denial of a *security* threat.Those opposed have said this is a bad policy, unless you want to destroy the west. No one defending mass migration has addressed that fact..
Terrorism is crime. Treating a few hundred or even thousand deaths like the imminent end of civilisation, is what pearl clutching hysterics do.
These attacks have effects.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: Habbening Thread
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Habbening Thread
Exactly this, DSL has not responded to any of my counterpoints and has continued to portray me as someone who defends violent Muslim attacks and continues to suggest that I want to "flood" my country with immigrants. He posts deliberately misleading videos and tells me there are no go areas in London and Shariah law on the streets. Why should I bother responding to his lies if all I get is more lies? I'm just glad there are others who can see through DSL's crap or otherwise I would just not bother posting here any more. To suggest I am not prepared to debate is also dishonest as my post count proves. This is the sort of crap which led to the death of the DCF and it's not ok by me.....BjornP wrote:Seriously Fife.. StA's tactic as always is to keep lying about what an individuel poster's actually is, then demand they defend "their" argument and complety ignore each time they try and tell him he is strawmanning. If some dishonest pos kept misrepresenting your views post after post, ad nauseum, no matter your efforts to correct him and progress with the debate, how many times would you think it worth to repeat your actual position to that guy?Fife wrote:Pro tip:
Spraying down a dissenting opinion with raw sewage is not the optimal method for promoting meaningful discussion.
One might actually consider posting actual counter-arguments rather than childish..
Anyway... Merry Christmas.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 18720
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Habbening Thread
I remember once a couple years ago when Smitty was hanging too long in threads that weren't entertaining (to him, I thought reading them was great fun), and I reminded him why he was posting...
Dude, let someone else take over when you're tired of a thread. Everybody who's following knows who won.
Dude, let someone else take over when you're tired of a thread. Everybody who's following knows who won.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Habbening Thread
Thing is it's not the thread I have a problem with, maybe I should just foe.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Habbening Thread
Okeefenokee wrote:Radical Islam has publicly stated their mission is to infiltrate the west through the refugee flow. They have had successes. Those opposed have said this is a bad policy, unless you want to destroy the west. No one defending mass migration has addressed that fact. They state it is a myth, even after numerous attacks. Even after Merkel admitted that radicals were entering with refugees.
They say it's fake, not happening, and not worthy of response, after countless examples of it being true.
That's the bullshit being challenged. It isn't up for debate that violent Muslims are intent on killing westerners. It's happening daily. Flail all you like, reality contradicts you.
Defend your stance that accepting countless violent extremists is a defensible plan. Stop dodging it.
Then they pretend like they are not really defending it. It's really pointless to engage with them.The only course of action is to totally defeat them politically, which is happening. Their antics and behavior do that for us as it is.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Habbening Thread
Again with the dishonesty, nobody is saying these attacks aren't happening. What myself and several others have said is that they are not statistically relevant and are certainly not proof of an Islamic take over of Europe. Nor are they proof that Muslim immigrants are inherently violent. The number of immigrants coming into Europe divided by the number of terrorist attacks committed by immigrants is so tiny as too not be worth even bringing up.
You see this is your tactic, repeating the same lies and strawmen until people give up and let you have the last word.Unfortunately for you I am stubborn as a mule and am not just going to give up when you malign me so you had better start debating honestly or brace yourselves for a lot more kitty pics.....
not true, nobody is saying attacks aren't happening.They say it's fake, not happening, and not worthy of response, after countless examples of it being true.
Not true without the word radical.It isn't up for debate that violent Muslims are intent on killing westerners.
Strawman, I have never said this.Defend your stance that accepting countless violent extremists is a defensible plan.
You see this is your tactic, repeating the same lies and strawmen until people give up and let you have the last word.Unfortunately for you I am stubborn as a mule and am not just going to give up when you malign me so you had better start debating honestly or brace yourselves for a lot more kitty pics.....
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.