Habbening Thread

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Habbening Thread

Post by Okeefenokee » Fri Dec 23, 2016 11:36 pm

Radical Islam has publicly stated their mission is to infiltrate the west through the refugee flow. They have had successes. Those opposed have said this is a bad policy, unless you want to destroy the west. No one defending mass migration has addressed that fact. They state it is a myth, even after numerous attacks. Even after Merkel admitted that radicals were entering with refugees.

They say it's fake, not happening, and not worthy of response, after countless examples of it being true.

That's the bullshit being challenged. It isn't up for debate that violent Muslims are intent on killing westerners. It's happening daily. Flail all you like, reality contradicts you.

Defend your stance that accepting countless violent extremists is a defensible plan. Stop dodging it.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Habbening Thread

Post by TheReal_ND » Fri Dec 23, 2016 11:40 pm

No. I'm pro Muslim immigration. They have good values. Westerners are degenerate Juggalo butt holes. Fuck them tbh. At least Muslims have a fucking code of decency.

User avatar
BjornP
Posts: 3360
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

Re: Habbening Thread

Post by BjornP » Sat Dec 24, 2016 12:19 am

Those opposed have said this is a bad policy, unless you want to destroy the west. No one defending mass migration has addressed that fact..
And how many in this thread have defended unrestricted mass migration, especially of violent extremists? Is Merkel a MHF poster? Has Monte voiced the opinion that Islam is a religion of peace somewhere? He replied to StA that the presented threat to British culture is overblown. That's not a denial of a *security* threat.

Terrorism is crime. Treating a few hundred or even thousand deaths like the imminent end of civilisation, is what pearl clutching hysterics do.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Habbening Thread

Post by Okeefenokee » Sat Dec 24, 2016 1:24 am

BjornP wrote:
Those opposed have said this is a bad policy, unless you want to destroy the west. No one defending mass migration has addressed that fact..
And how many in this thread have defended unrestricted mass migration, especially of violent extremists? Is Merkel a MHF poster? Has Monte voiced the opinion that Islam is a religion of peace somewhere? He replied to StA that the presented threat to British culture is overblown. That's not a denial of a *security* threat.

Terrorism is crime. Treating a few hundred or even thousand deaths like the imminent end of civilisation, is what pearl clutching hysterics do.
Patriot Act.

These attacks have effects.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Habbening Thread

Post by Okeefenokee » Sat Dec 24, 2016 2:44 am

GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Habbening Thread

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Dec 24, 2016 3:36 am

BjornP wrote:
Fife wrote:Pro tip:

Spraying down a dissenting opinion with raw sewage is not the optimal method for promoting meaningful discussion.

One might actually consider posting actual counter-arguments rather than childish..
Seriously Fife.. :roll: StA's tactic as always is to keep lying about what an individuel poster's actually is, then demand they defend "their" argument and complety ignore each time they try and tell him he is strawmanning. If some dishonest pos kept misrepresenting your views post after post, ad nauseum, no matter your efforts to correct him and progress with the debate, how many times would you think it worth to repeat your actual position to that guy?

Anyway... Merry Christmas.
Exactly this, DSL has not responded to any of my counterpoints and has continued to portray me as someone who defends violent Muslim attacks and continues to suggest that I want to "flood" my country with immigrants. He posts deliberately misleading videos and tells me there are no go areas in London and Shariah law on the streets. Why should I bother responding to his lies if all I get is more lies? I'm just glad there are others who can see through DSL's crap or otherwise I would just not bother posting here any more. To suggest I am not prepared to debate is also dishonest as my post count proves. This is the sort of crap which led to the death of the DCF and it's not ok by me.....
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18720
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Habbening Thread

Post by Martin Hash » Sat Dec 24, 2016 3:47 am

I remember once a couple years ago when Smitty was hanging too long in threads that weren't entertaining (to him, I thought reading them was great fun), and I reminded him why he was posting...

Dude, let someone else take over when you're tired of a thread. Everybody who's following knows who won.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Habbening Thread

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Dec 24, 2016 4:14 am

Thing is it's not the thread I have a problem with, maybe I should just foe.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Habbening Thread

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Dec 24, 2016 7:02 am

Okeefenokee wrote:Radical Islam has publicly stated their mission is to infiltrate the west through the refugee flow. They have had successes. Those opposed have said this is a bad policy, unless you want to destroy the west. No one defending mass migration has addressed that fact. They state it is a myth, even after numerous attacks. Even after Merkel admitted that radicals were entering with refugees.

They say it's fake, not happening, and not worthy of response, after countless examples of it being true.

That's the bullshit being challenged. It isn't up for debate that violent Muslims are intent on killing westerners. It's happening daily. Flail all you like, reality contradicts you.

Defend your stance that accepting countless violent extremists is a defensible plan. Stop dodging it.

Then they pretend like they are not really defending it. It's really pointless to engage with them.The only course of action is to totally defeat them politically, which is happening. Their antics and behavior do that for us as it is.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Habbening Thread

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Dec 24, 2016 7:21 am

Again with the dishonesty, nobody is saying these attacks aren't happening. What myself and several others have said is that they are not statistically relevant and are certainly not proof of an Islamic take over of Europe. Nor are they proof that Muslim immigrants are inherently violent. The number of immigrants coming into Europe divided by the number of terrorist attacks committed by immigrants is so tiny as too not be worth even bringing up.
They say it's fake, not happening, and not worthy of response, after countless examples of it being true.
not true, nobody is saying attacks aren't happening.
It isn't up for debate that violent Muslims are intent on killing westerners.
Not true without the word radical.
Defend your stance that accepting countless violent extremists is a defensible plan.
Strawman, I have never said this.

You see this is your tactic, repeating the same lies and strawmen until people give up and let you have the last word.Unfortunately for you I am stubborn as a mule and am not just going to give up when you malign me so you had better start debating honestly or brace yourselves for a lot more kitty pics.....
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image