They both suck. Your point is? Are we supposed to be content choosing between horrible and horrible?heydaralon wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 12:30 pmHillary Clinton was the better choice. She has no desire to use her office to enrich herself. Many honest people run for public office and stay in it for decades and make hundreds of millions of dollars. That is perfectly reasonable. That's who I want in the White House.
Connecticut
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Connecticut
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Connecticut
Come on Milfspecs, how are people going to attack you for being a Communist if you don't support Communism. You are just being unfair now.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Connecticut
Reasonable is the new unfair.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 1:35 pmCome on Milfspecs, how are people going to attack you for being a Communist if you don't support Communism. You are just being unfair now.
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Connecticut
I’m rather fond of the ancestors but they were families, not just men. They didn’t care for most Christians, either. I’m much more tolerant.heydaralon wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 12:37 pmMilspecs is 100% cool with it though she wouldn't admit it. She has not grasped the idea that in a communist takeover, her property would be confiscated immediately and she would be killed by the Bolshies, but she does like the idea as a way to get back at the White Christian Men who built this civilization.
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Connecticut
Why do you even attempt to sugarcoat shit? Seriously, we see it's shit, we can smell the shit, we can tell by touching it that it's shit... we are not going to eat the fucking stuff just because you think sugar coating it is going to make it taste better going down.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 11:38 amWhy do people think a tiny minority of Communists are a threat to the US but the far right is exaggerated and no real danger?
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Connecticut
"Tiny communist minority"
-
- Posts: 7571
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm
Re: Connecticut
If you are fond of them, why is most of the stuff you are defending completely antithetical to what they stood for?MilSpecs wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 2:23 pmI’m rather fond of the ancestors but they were families, not just men. They didn’t care for most Christians, either. I’m much more tolerant.heydaralon wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 12:37 pmMilspecs is 100% cool with it though she wouldn't admit it. She has not grasped the idea that in a communist takeover, her property would be confiscated immediately and she would be killed by the Bolshies, but she does like the idea as a way to get back at the White Christian Men who built this civilization.
Shikata ga nai
-
- Posts: 1852
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
- Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey
Re: Connecticut
Same reason I don’t kill people with a different moral code than I have. Their accomplishments were incredible but they had crazy beliefs.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Connecticut
That doesn't really answer the question. Was it too hard for you?The Conservative wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 2:30 pmWhy do you even attempt to sugarcoat shit? Seriously, we see it's shit, we can smell the shit, we can tell by touching it that it's shit... we are not going to eat the fucking stuff just because you think sugar coating it is going to make it taste better going down.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 11:38 amWhy do people think a tiny minority of Communists are a threat to the US but the far right is exaggerated and no real danger?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.