Connecticut

User avatar
MilSpecs
Posts: 1852
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey

Re: Connecticut

Post by MilSpecs » Thu Dec 20, 2018 1:08 pm

heydaralon wrote:
Thu Dec 20, 2018 12:30 pm
Hillary Clinton was the better choice. She has no desire to use her office to enrich herself. Many honest people run for public office and stay in it for decades and make hundreds of millions of dollars. That is perfectly reasonable. That's who I want in the White House.
They both suck. Your point is? Are we supposed to be content choosing between horrible and horrible?
:royalty-queen:

User avatar
MilSpecs
Posts: 1852
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey

Re: Connecticut

Post by MilSpecs » Thu Dec 20, 2018 1:19 pm

Zlaxer wrote:
Thu Dec 20, 2018 12:49 pm
MilSpecs wrote:
Thu Dec 20, 2018 12:28 pm
No really - I want to know if she's cool with Communism, or at least the direction of the DNC.
Neither.
:royalty-queen:

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Connecticut

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Dec 20, 2018 1:35 pm

MilSpecs wrote:
Thu Dec 20, 2018 1:19 pm
Zlaxer wrote:
Thu Dec 20, 2018 12:49 pm
MilSpecs wrote:
Thu Dec 20, 2018 12:28 pm
No really - I want to know if she's cool with Communism, or at least the direction of the DNC.
Neither.
Come on Milfspecs, how are people going to attack you for being a Communist if you don't support Communism. You are just being unfair now.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
MilSpecs
Posts: 1852
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey

Re: Connecticut

Post by MilSpecs » Thu Dec 20, 2018 2:08 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Thu Dec 20, 2018 1:35 pm
MilSpecs wrote:
Thu Dec 20, 2018 1:19 pm
Zlaxer wrote:
Thu Dec 20, 2018 12:49 pm


No really - I want to know if she's cool with Communism, or at least the direction of the DNC.
Neither.
Come on Milfspecs, how are people going to attack you for being a Communist if you don't support Communism. You are just being unfair now.
Reasonable is the new unfair. ;)
:royalty-queen:

User avatar
MilSpecs
Posts: 1852
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey

Re: Connecticut

Post by MilSpecs » Thu Dec 20, 2018 2:23 pm

heydaralon wrote:
Thu Dec 20, 2018 12:37 pm
Milspecs is 100% cool with it though she wouldn't admit it. She has not grasped the idea that in a communist takeover, her property would be confiscated immediately and she would be killed by the Bolshies, but she does like the idea as a way to get back at the White Christian Men who built this civilization.
I’m rather fond of the ancestors but they were families, not just men. They didn’t care for most Christians, either. I’m much more tolerant.
:royalty-queen:

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14797
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Connecticut

Post by The Conservative » Thu Dec 20, 2018 2:30 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Thu Dec 20, 2018 11:38 am
Why do people think a tiny minority of Communists are a threat to the US but the far right is exaggerated and no real danger?
Why do you even attempt to sugarcoat shit? Seriously, we see it's shit, we can smell the shit, we can tell by touching it that it's shit... we are not going to eat the fucking stuff just because you think sugar coating it is going to make it taste better going down.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Connecticut

Post by Speaker to Animals » Thu Dec 20, 2018 2:36 pm

"Tiny communist minority"

:naughty:

heydaralon
Posts: 7571
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm

Re: Connecticut

Post by heydaralon » Thu Dec 20, 2018 2:47 pm

MilSpecs wrote:
Thu Dec 20, 2018 2:23 pm
heydaralon wrote:
Thu Dec 20, 2018 12:37 pm
Milspecs is 100% cool with it though she wouldn't admit it. She has not grasped the idea that in a communist takeover, her property would be confiscated immediately and she would be killed by the Bolshies, but she does like the idea as a way to get back at the White Christian Men who built this civilization.
I’m rather fond of the ancestors but they were families, not just men. They didn’t care for most Christians, either. I’m much more tolerant.
If you are fond of them, why is most of the stuff you are defending completely antithetical to what they stood for?
Shikata ga nai

User avatar
MilSpecs
Posts: 1852
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:13 pm
Location: Deep in the heart of Jersey

Re: Connecticut

Post by MilSpecs » Thu Dec 20, 2018 3:00 pm

Same reason I don’t kill people with a different moral code than I have. Their accomplishments were incredible but they had crazy beliefs.
:royalty-queen:

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: Connecticut

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Dec 20, 2018 3:09 pm

The Conservative wrote:
Thu Dec 20, 2018 2:30 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Thu Dec 20, 2018 11:38 am
Why do people think a tiny minority of Communists are a threat to the US but the far right is exaggerated and no real danger?
Why do you even attempt to sugarcoat shit? Seriously, we see it's shit, we can smell the shit, we can tell by touching it that it's shit... we are not going to eat the fucking stuff just because you think sugar coating it is going to make it taste better going down.
That doesn't really answer the question. Was it too hard for you?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image