You're talking about generational trends, taking place across decades, where millions of people were born, grew up, and replaced older generations, and trying to tie that to one point in time in order to satisfy a narrative that asserts that southerners are racist.StCapps wrote:1) It is more accurate to say "people in the south" sure.Okeefenokee wrote:1. How many votes does, "the south," get, or would it be more accurate to say people in the south?StCapps wrote:I am claiming that before the 1960s, the South mostly voted Democrat and ever since they've mostly voted Republican.
2. Are we talking about the same people who voted in 1861, 1950, and 2018 living for hundreds of years, or was there some turnover making this continuity idea a little delusional?
2) There was some turnover, but a lot of "people in the south" simply flipped parties from Democrat to Republican, and there is plenty of continuity. Some turnover doesn't negate that.
If the 1968 flip actually happened over night, and southerners all abandoned the party of jim crow en masse, and joined the party that passed the civil rights act, it would seem that the idea that those people did so because they're racist is just as absurd.