Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Kath is learning from Trump's art of the deal 4d chess tactics.
Threaten moderation in order to acheive the lesser aim of stopping NHL spam infesting one single Olympics thread. Capps is acting like an SJW snowflake so butt hurt that he can not see what a douchebag he looks like.
It remains to be seen whether Kath will carry out her threat but this has not stopped Capps from making a fool of himself. Sad.
Threaten moderation in order to acheive the lesser aim of stopping NHL spam infesting one single Olympics thread. Capps is acting like an SJW snowflake so butt hurt that he can not see what a douchebag he looks like.
It remains to be seen whether Kath will carry out her threat but this has not stopped Capps from making a fool of himself. Sad.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 4050
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:13 pm
- Location: Canadastan
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
I am listening to your side... that's why I asked you to give it.StCapps wrote: Stop listening to Kath's interpretation for the reasons I'm started this thread, or monte's, they couldn't be more wrong about why I actually started this thread. Kath was just paranoid about not having an Olympic thread that goes the way she wants, and was so butthurt about that, that she threatened to use her powers selectively to impose a safe space on the forum, to ensure at least Olympic thread would go the way she wanted, and now her paranoid reaction has created a self fulfilling prophecy. I would have been nice, but then censorship was threatened, to try and make me be nice.
My summary so far.
You didn't respect the thread. Posting off content material repeatedly and gratuitously.
And didn't respond to being called out on that.
That's bad. 1 point against Cappy
(I find your incessant NHL chat in threads you don't like annoying too... this isn't the first time you two have done that... I have to scroll past all your posts to keep up with the thread... keep it to an NHL thread.)
Kath threatened censorship when you wouldn't respond to her requests.
Threatening censorship is bad... 2 points against Kath.
You then tried to start a forum referendum to get fired Kath by Marty so that you wouldn't be threatened any more...
And took no responsibility for your initial infraction.... 3 points against Cappy.
Score is at 2:4...
Not a blow out by any means.... but game Kath so far... IMHO
Feel free to contest my scoring and I am happy to modify it with more incoming information.
Last edited by DrYouth on Thu Feb 08, 2018 10:51 am, edited 2 times in total.
Deep down tho, I still thirst to kill you and eat you. Ultra Chimp can't help it.. - Smitty
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
I didn't threaten censorship, hence she is far more butthurt than I.Montegriffo wrote:Kath is learning from Trump's art of the deal 4d chess tactics.
Threaten moderation in order to acheive the lesser aim of stopping NHL spam infesting one single Olympics thread. Capps is acting like an SJW snowflake so butt hurt that he can not see what a douchebag he looks like.
It remains to be seen whether Kath will carry out her threat but this has not stopped Capps from making a fool of himself. Sad.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
I'm not trying to get her fired, I just think she should be given her inclination to selectively censor those whose posts she doesn't like, and if Martin Hash isn't a hypocrite, he would agree.DrYouth wrote:You didn't respect the thread. Posting off content material repeatedly and gratuitously.StCapps wrote: Stop listening to Kath's interpretation for the reasons I'm started this thread, or monte's, they couldn't be more wrong about why I actually started this thread. Kath was just paranoid about not having an Olympic thread that goes the way she wants, and was so butthurt about that, that she threatened to use her powers selectively to impose a safe space on the forum, to ensure at least Olympic thread would go the way she wanted, and now her paranoid reaction has created a self fulfilling prophecy. I would have been nice, but then censorship was threatened, to try and make me be nice.
And didn't respond to being called out on that.
That's bad. 1 point against Cappy
(I find your incessant NHL chat in threads you don't like annoying too... this isn't the first time you two have done that... I have to scroll past all your posts to keep up with the thread... keep it to an NHL thread.)
Kath threatened censorship when you wouldn't respond to her requests.
Threatening censorship is bad... 2 points against Kath.
You then tried to start a forum referendum to get fired Kath by Marty so that you wouldn't be threatened any more...
And took no responsibility for your initial infraction.... 3 points against Cappy.
Score is at 2:5...
Not a blow out by any means.... but game Kath so far... IMHO
Your score keeping sucks balls. I took responsibility for my actions, I just don't take kindly to threats of censorship, you aren't even paying attention to what happened and are excepting Kath and Monte's version of events.
Last edited by StCapps on Thu Feb 08, 2018 10:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 4050
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:13 pm
- Location: Canadastan
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
No new info in that post...StCapps wrote:I'm not trying to get her fired, I just think she should be and if Martin Hash isn't a hypocrite, he would agree. Your score keeping sucks balls.
But I did miscount the points...
2:4
The score stands.
I vote that Kath remains.
I also agree that you should keep your NHL chatter to NHL threads...
If you forget to that's fine...
If you are reminded of it... I would expect you would respect the wishes of any poster in a specified thread... including Kath.
Last edited by DrYouth on Thu Feb 08, 2018 10:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
Deep down tho, I still thirst to kill you and eat you. Ultra Chimp can't help it.. - Smitty
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Still terrible score keeping. I was going to let them have their thread, but then war was declared by threatening censorship, and now it's war.DrYouth wrote:No new info in that post...StCapps wrote:I'm not trying to get her fired, I just think she should be and if Martin Hash isn't a hypocrite, he would agree. Your score keeping sucks balls.
But I did miscount the points...
2:4
The score stands.
Last edited by StCapps on Thu Feb 08, 2018 10:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?
Dr Youth's scorekeeping maths 5/10.DrYouth wrote:I am listening to your side... that's why I asked you to give it.StCapps wrote: Stop listening to Kath's interpretation for the reasons I'm started this thread, or monte's, they couldn't be more wrong about why I actually started this thread. Kath was just paranoid about not having an Olympic thread that goes the way she wants, and was so butthurt about that, that she threatened to use her powers selectively to impose a safe space on the forum, to ensure at least Olympic thread would go the way she wanted, and now her paranoid reaction has created a self fulfilling prophecy. I would have been nice, but then censorship was threatened, to try and make me be nice.
My summary so far.
You didn't respect the thread. Posting off content material repeatedly and gratuitously.
And didn't respond to being called out on that.
That's bad. 1 point against Cappy
(I find your incessant NHL chat in threads you don't like annoying too... this isn't the first time you two have done that... I have to scroll past all your posts to keep up with the thread... keep it to an NHL thread.)
Kath threatened censorship when you wouldn't respond to her requests.
Threatening censorship is bad... 2 points against Kath.
You then tried to start a forum referendum to get fired Kath by Marty so that you wouldn't be threatened any more...
And took no responsibility for your initial infraction.... 3 points against Cappy.
Score is at 2:4...
Not a blow out by any means.... but game Kath so far... IMHO
Feel free to contest my scoring and I am happy to modify it with more incoming information.
Rational interpretation of the issue 10/10
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am