No, you are on a role with the straw man lying.GrumpyCatFace wrote: ↑Sun May 13, 2018 7:05 amAmazonian tribes in 2018 don’t wear jewelry, therefore European tribes 50,000 years ago didn’t either. Therefore jewelry is just for women.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Sun May 13, 2018 7:01 amActually we really were that desperate. The genetic evidence is incontrovertible. At one point, the human species was down to less than twenty thousand people. Human clans must have gone extinct all the time.GrumpyCatFace wrote: ↑Sun May 13, 2018 6:55 am
Perhaps we weren’t as desperate as you picture.
Also, any man of importance would probably have worn jewelry, to signify his rank. It’s wasnt a casual thing simply for beauty, when it took weeks to craft by hand.
If you look at primitive hunter-gatherer societies in existence today, the kind of adornments worn by men are usually rather simple. They might put wooden blocks in their lower lips, or sticks through their penises, etc. I am talking about straight-up jewelry in the paleolithic. Women actually had jewelry before we even had stone buildings. That should tell you everything about who actually controlled the species.
You’re on a roll today.
We find the jewelry buried with female skeletons, you twit.