Speaker to Animals wrote:Smitty-48 wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:I just listed like five fucking examples and you cut them out of the quote to say there are no examples! Get real, man. You are totally wrong here.
The Roman Empire was a slave empire, humans were capital, specific to general fallacies does not an empire of extermination make, extermination was the exception, not the rule, the rule, was integration and absoption into the whole, of the human capital, which was the source of their wealth and power.
No, Smitty. They literally exterminated people. Before the Third Punic War, there existed a Carthaginian people. After the Third Punic War, there existed no Carthaginian people or even a city where Carthage once stood.
Before the Roman conquest of Corinth, there existed a Corinthian people. After the Roman conquest of Corinth, there existed no Corinthian people.
Genocide was oft their policy, guy. You are quite wrong here.
Just to correct you, those wars were not fought by the Roman Empire but rather the Roman Republic, but the fallacy in your assertion of course, is that the Romans did not actually exterminate city states out of existence, rather, they absorbed them out of existence, there were no Carthaginians nor Corinthians, because of course, they all became Romans, but again, both are specific to general fallacies as well, because neither Carthage nor Corinth was the way the Romans operated in general, and in fact, the anihaltion of those citiies marked a radical departure from Roman policy even at the time.
Very rare occurrences in specific contexts being asserted as the general nature of a thing; fallacy.
Also note, Juiius Ceasar refounded Corinth as a Roman City, Colonia Laus Iulia Corinthiensis, which is why there is a still a Corinth there to this day, the ruins that you actually see in Corinth, are the Roman ruins, because the Romans absorbed Corinth into Rome.