I don't see that as any reason to not discuss them and/or not endorse their policy ideas. /shrugsStCapps wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 3:00 amYang and Tulsi aren't Trump, they don't have talent to win over the rubes, nor do they have name recognition or the campaign funds necessary to pull off what Trump did. If you think Yang or Tulsi is the next Trump, I have a bridge to sell you. Trump is a rare exception, that doesn't mean anyone anti-establishment candidate can do what he did.
Russia! Russia!! Russia!!!
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Russia! Russia!! Russia!!!
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: Russia! Russia!! Russia!!!
The Dickhead senator from CT says more indicitnents are comming - seriously begs the questions if the DNC/marxists want civil war - its fucking obvious that they’re trying to unseat a duly elected president....that’s sedition....
If they succeed - then the fed looses credibility...well...whatever cred they have left anyways...
If they succeed - then the fed looses credibility...well...whatever cred they have left anyways...
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Russia! Russia!! Russia!!!
Neither do I, we were discussing NIT just the other day in fact.Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 3:11 amI don't see that as any reason to not discuss them and/or not endorse their policy ideas. /shrugsStCapps wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 3:00 amYang and Tulsi aren't Trump, they don't have talent to win over the rubes, nor do they have name recognition or the campaign funds necessary to pull off what Trump did. If you think Yang or Tulsi is the next Trump, I have a bridge to sell you. Trump is a rare exception, that doesn't mean anyone anti-establishment candidate can do what he did.
Just saying, they can't troll the media into giving them billions of dollars worth of free media coverage, so don't be mislead into thinking they are Trump 2.0, that would be a clear example of wishful thinking.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Russia! Russia!! Russia!!!
classic trump, 2015
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Russia! Russia!! Russia!!!
And yet, with all the emails, etc they looked through, they didn't say he did... if they looked at the Clintons that deep, they probably would see Bill Clinton and Al Gore dealing with NK to give them the plans for how to build a nuke.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Russia! Russia!! Russia!!!
When did I say they are Trump 2.0?
It's not wishful thinking, it's just something to discuss other than the betting line.
Go ahead and vote for Trump, I don't endorse him, but I don't care neither..
Barring thermonuclear war, who the President is doesn't have much impact on us
I don't see Trump as being significant change, Neocon status quo, nothing to get excited about in either way.
Even in case of thermonuclear war, that would be a heck of a way to go, I lived to see the mushroom clouds, ultimate Rickian toadasso.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:18 pm
Re: Russia! Russia!! Russia!!!
Former CIA Director John Brennan who blasted Trump and called Trumps denials of collusion "hogwash" went on MSNBC to try and explain why he got it so wrong.
His excuse?
Bad intel.
This is literally a real life comedy playing out on the national stage. Any other normal citizen trying to tap dance out of outrageous allegations like he made would be (rightfully) blasted by the media.
His excuse?
Bad intel.
This is literally a real life comedy playing out on the national stage. Any other normal citizen trying to tap dance out of outrageous allegations like he made would be (rightfully) blasted by the media.