[s]YouTube stuff[/s] cancelled

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Smitty-48 » Sat Nov 16, 2019 7:19 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Nov 16, 2019 7:13 pm
He needs to avoid driving through tunnels in the future.
Seriously, what do you do with this? This is literally the most scandalous thing in the history of the Firm

Now a hundred years ago banging a 17 year old wouldn't have been that scandalous,

But if you take what is this scandalous now, whatever the hundred years ago version of that is?

George V would have him gassed like cousin Nicky for it. Just make him go away.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Nov 16, 2019 7:41 pm

He was asked if he would provide an affidavit under oath to support what he'd said tonight and he couldn't even answer that without fudging it. Rather than just say yes, he said he would have to take legal advice on whether that was a good thing for him to do. Why would you say that if you knew you had told the truth and had nothing to hide?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Montegriffo » Sat Nov 16, 2019 7:48 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Nov 16, 2019 5:34 pm
Smitty-48 wrote:
Sat Nov 16, 2019 5:26 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Nov 16, 2019 2:39 pm
Yeah right.
Indeed. Since it happened in London, he should have just copped to it.

Could've just said he thought she was older, taken the hit for it, but then it has nowhere to go.
The photo was at Epstein's New York apartment.
The sex after a London nightclub was a second occasion where he is accused by Roberts of having sex with her.
I guess that he can't admit to the time in London as it would weaken his denial of the New York sex.
Best to just close his eyes and make a bare-faced lie about not remembering ever meeting her.
Ah, you were right. The photo was from Ghislaine Maxwell's house in London. He said that he couldn't explain it because he'd never been upstairs at her house.
Image
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Smitty-48 » Sat Nov 16, 2019 8:41 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Nov 16, 2019 7:48 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Nov 16, 2019 5:34 pm
Smitty-48 wrote:
Sat Nov 16, 2019 5:26 pm


Indeed. Since it happened in London, he should have just copped to it.

Could've just said he thought she was older, taken the hit for it, but then it has nowhere to go.
The photo was at Epstein's New York apartment.
The sex after a London nightclub was a second occasion where he is accused by Roberts of having sex with her.
I guess that he can't admit to the time in London as it would weaken his denial of the New York sex.
Best to just close his eyes and make a bare-faced lie about not remembering ever meeting her.
Ah, you were right. The photo was from Ghislaine Maxwell's house in London. He said that he couldn't explain it because he'd never been upstairs at her house.
Image
Too many non denial denials and that is a teenage kid not a date for Royal Navy senior officer.

Wallis Simpson did nothing wrong, this is beyond the pale.
Nec Aspera Terrent

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Smitty-48 » Sat Nov 16, 2019 9:02 pm

Like if he said; "yes, I met that girl, she was a associate of so and so, she wanted to meet me, we had milk and cookies and I signed an autograph for her, but I certainly never had sex with her, good lord . . ."

That would be a denial.

"I don't recall ever meeting her" when obviously he did, means he knows there could be more to follow.

That non denial denial is not convincing me is innocent of the accusation, he's just weaseling.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by clubgop » Sat Nov 16, 2019 11:42 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Sat Nov 16, 2019 7:41 pm
He was asked if he would provide an affidavit under oath to support what he'd said tonight and he couldn't even answer that without fudging it. Rather than just say yes, he said he would have to take legal advice on whether that was a good thing for him to do. Why would you say that if you knew you had told the truth and had nothing to hide?
Famous last words of every innocent man. You don't talk to police or sign a damn thing without the advice of legal council. Why don't you consent to daily cavity searches? You have done nothing wrong and don't have anything to hide.

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Smitty-48 » Sat Nov 16, 2019 11:59 pm

It's not even a question of whether or not it was legal, the age of consent in the UK is 16, so technically legal.

But when you are HRH the Duke of York, you are held to a higher standard than simply not being a criminal.

Even if it was technically legal, if he fucked that teenage girl, he deserves to be stripped of his title.

And if he didn't fuck that teenage girl, why the hell doesn't he just say so?

Sounds like he did fuck her, he's told the Firm, and the Firm has told him to just say you don't recall.

Like this can't be just him running this, this is being run by the Palace for sure.

Nobody does anything in the Firm on their own, everything is stage managed from the top.
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
Hastur
Posts: 5297
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
Location: suiþiuþu

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Hastur » Tue Nov 19, 2019 6:32 am

Any Lee Hazelwood fans here?

Image

An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna

Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Smitty-48 » Tue Nov 19, 2019 7:42 am

Hastur wrote:
Tue Nov 19, 2019 6:32 am
Any Lee Hazelwood fans here?
More of a Nancy Sinatra fan, with Lee as her sidekick.

Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
TheReal_ND
Posts: 26035
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by TheReal_ND » Sun Dec 01, 2019 5:36 pm