-
ssu
- Posts: 2142
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 4:05 pm
Post
by ssu » Sun Oct 22, 2017 8:11 am
The Conservative wrote:Montegriffo wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Wow....
Hill also said where there was evidence of a crime they should be arrested. You know, rule of law not internment without trial. Western values at work.
And you have an issue with that? Also, should and will are two different things.
The British know how to handle insurgents.
Americans don't.
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Post
by The Conservative » Sun Oct 22, 2017 8:18 am
ssu wrote:The Conservative wrote:Montegriffo wrote:
Hill also said where there was evidence of a crime they should be arrested. You know, rule of law not internment without trial. Western values at work.
And you have an issue with that? Also, should and will are two different things.
The British know how to handle insurgents.
Americans don't.
Yeah, remind me what happens about that back in the late 1770s when the British tried to stop insurgents?
#NotOneRedCent
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Sun Oct 22, 2017 8:22 am
The Conservative wrote:ssu wrote:The Conservative wrote:
And you have an issue with that? Also, should and will are two different things.
The British know how to handle insurgents.
Americans don't.
Yeah, remind me what happens about that back in the late 1770s when the British tried to stop insurgents?
They worked out they weren't going to win and gave up. That's why we are better at insurgencies than you.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Post
by The Conservative » Sun Oct 22, 2017 8:25 am
Montegriffo wrote:The Conservative wrote:ssu wrote:
The British know how to handle insurgents.
Americans don't.
Yeah, remind me what happens about that back in the late 1770s when the British tried to stop insurgents?
They worked out they weren't going to win and gave up. That's why we are better at insurgencies than you.
Who the hell are you talking to?
#NotOneRedCent
-
ssu
- Posts: 2142
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 4:05 pm
Post
by ssu » Sun Oct 22, 2017 8:25 am
The Conservative wrote:ssu wrote:The Conservative wrote:
And you have an issue with that? Also, should and will are two different things.
The British know how to handle insurgents.
Americans don't.
Yeah, remind me what happens about that back in the late 1770s when the British tried to stop insurgents?
You are now their friends and allies. No plan Red happened.
Now the US might have warmer relations with Vietnam now, but they aren't your allies.
Hence in the post-conflict diplomacy the British are better.
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Sun Oct 22, 2017 8:29 am
The Conservative wrote:Montegriffo wrote:The Conservative wrote:
Yeah, remind me what happens about that back in the late 1770s when the British tried to stop insurgents?
They worked out they weren't going to win and gave up. That's why we are better at insurgencies than you.
Who the hell are you talking to?
Not SSU clearly as he doesn't need things explained to him in words of limited syllables.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
Okeefenokee
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Post
by Okeefenokee » Sun Oct 22, 2017 8:33 am
ssu wrote:The Conservative wrote:Montegriffo wrote:
Hill also said where there was evidence of a crime they should be arrested. You know, rule of law not internment without trial. Western values at work.
And you have an issue with that? Also, should and will are two different things.
The British know how to handle insurgents.
Americans don't.
They sure handled the Zionists, eh?
Oh, wait.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751
-
Fife
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Post
by Fife » Sun Oct 22, 2017 8:45 am
"It Could Open A Pandora's Box": Italy's 2 Richest Regions Are Voting In Historic Autonomy Referendums
Voters in Italy's two wealthiest northern regions of Lombardy and Veneto are voting on Sunday in referendums for greater autonomy from Rome, in which a positive outcome could fan regional tensions in Europe at a time when neighboring Spain is cracking down to prevent Catalonia from breaking away.
Lombardy, which includes Milan, and Veneto, which houses the tourist powerhouse Venice, are home to around a quarter of Italy's population and account for 30% of Italy's economy, the Eurozone's third largest. Unlike Catalonia, the consultative votes are only the beginning of a process which could over time lead to powers being devolved from Rome. Also unlike Catalonia, which held an independence referendum on Oct. 1 despite it being ruled unconstitutional, the Italian referendums are within the law. Like Catalonia, however, Lombardy and Veneto complain they pay far more in taxes than they receive.
:goteam: :drunk:
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Post
by The Conservative » Sun Oct 22, 2017 8:50 am
Montegriffo wrote:The Conservative wrote:Montegriffo wrote:
They worked out they weren't going to win and gave up. That's why we are better at insurgencies than you.
Who the hell are you talking to?
Not SSU clearly as he doesn't need things explained to him in words of limited syllables.
Then you dont understand why they lost. The US was out manned, out gunned, and lout classed. The Us shouldn’t have won.
So to just say what you did shows your own ignorance.
#NotOneRedCent
-
BjornP
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Post
by BjornP » Sun Oct 22, 2017 8:56 am
The Conservative wrote:Montegriffo wrote:The Conservative wrote:
Who the hell are you talking to?
Not SSU clearly as he doesn't need things explained to him in words of limited syllables.
Then you dont understand why they lost. The US was out manned, out gunned, and lout classed. The Us shouldn’t have won.
So to just say what you did shows your own ignorance.
I can name two good reasons why the American colonies won. They're called France and Spain...
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.