Trump's SCOTUS

[StCapps]

Dude, I'll tell you what: come down here & prevent a woman from having an abortion, or take people's guns, or stop them from paragliding, and see what happens? Perhaps you're right? Perhaps you won't end up in jail? That'll convince me that you're correct that life comes before liberty. It's up to you to prove an outlandish claim...

None of what you said proves Liberty comes before Life and that's the law. You cite exceptions to the rule and act like they are the rule, talk about outlandish claims. The existence of abortion does not prove that Life is subordinate to Liberty in the American ethos.

[Martin Hash]

???

p.s. How does a lawyer debate a non-lawyer about The Law. It's fuckin' impossible.

[StCapps]

???

p.s. How does a lawyer debate a non-lawyer about The Law. It's fuckin' impossible.

Appeal to authority. Typical of someone who has no argument. You are phoning it in Hash, step your game up.

[Martin Hash]

???

p.s. How does a lawyer debate a non-lawyer about The Law. It's fuckin' impossible.

Appeal to authority. Typical of someone who has no argument.

Dude, that only works when I'm appealing to an authority. I AM THE AUTHORITY.

[StCapps]

???

p.s. How does a lawyer debate a non-lawyer about The Law. It's fuckin' impossible.

Appeal to authority. Typical of someone who has no argument.

Dude, that only works when I'm appealing to an authority. I AM THE AUTHORITY.

No if you appeal to your own authority, that is still an appeal to authority and a logical fallacy. Step your game up or quit while you're behind.

If you have an argument the make it, "I'm an expert, respect my authoritah!" isn't an argument.

[Martin Hash]

(You know, other people read this.)

[StCapps]

(You know, other people read this.)

And yet you keep making a fool of yourself, with you're "I'm an expert, so just take my word for it with no explanation, only lawyers have worthy arguments on this topic" line of reasoning. It's sad.

[Martin Hash]

[StCapps]

"I'm an expert" loses every single argument ever had in this place. Appealing to credentials and ducking the argument because you don't actually have a point doesn't fool anyone dude.

[C-Mag]

Looking to the possible future of the SCOTUS.

Trump could potentially fill 5 spots on the SCOTUS merely based on age. Most Justices retire/die by 80. Scalia was 79

Red Ruth Ginsburg 85
Anthony Kennedy 82
Stephen Breyer 81
Clarence Thomas 71

Few Presidents get the opportunity to shape the court and America Law this way, and when they do, it leaves a legacy. Presidents like Washington, Lincoln and FDR got this opportunity. People for or against a Trump America need to understand a very real Legacy that impacts the US for decades could easily be made in this way.