Rejecting Institutions
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Rejecting Institutions
I’m still comfortable with my ongoing strategy. Third Party, or Challenger (if not available).
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Rejecting Institutions
everything is downstream from culture, that's why its a culture war
I don't think the culture is shaped by parties nor politicians
Canada has three parties, it doesn't make any difference whatsoever, all parties are easily co-opted by the elites
I don't think the culture is shaped by parties nor politicians
Canada has three parties, it doesn't make any difference whatsoever, all parties are easily co-opted by the elites
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Rejecting Institutions
The USSR collapsed.
I'm not sure what they have now.
What's the government time where the ex-KGB guy, the oligarchs, and the Russian mod become the new government and re-elect the same guy over and over. Or sometimes shuffle him between president and prime minister?
You can wait them out ... but what's on the other side?
I'm not sure what they have now.
What's the government time where the ex-KGB guy, the oligarchs, and the Russian mod become the new government and re-elect the same guy over and over. Or sometimes shuffle him between president and prime minister?
You can wait them out ... but what's on the other side?
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Rejecting Institutions
entropy is the nature of the universe
assuming that things will get better is a leftist paradigm
the Hegelian myth of human progress, I don't subscribe to it
so I don't see a revival on the horizon, I don't think the heydays are coming back
what is on the other side for me is the next world to come, I'm not going to live to see the end of America
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Rejecting Institutions
when I look to public intellectuals who share my values
be that Tom Sowell or Niall Ferguson or Jordan Peterson, what have you
none of them have any positive news, it's all pretty bleak in terms of the Enlightenment at this point
it's like Thomas Sowell just says he is glad he is going to die soon, so he doesn't watch the catastrophes to come
be that Tom Sowell or Niall Ferguson or Jordan Peterson, what have you
none of them have any positive news, it's all pretty bleak in terms of the Enlightenment at this point
it's like Thomas Sowell just says he is glad he is going to die soon, so he doesn't watch the catastrophes to come
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Rejecting Institutions
at the end of the day, it is my faith which sustains me
God has smiled on me, I have had a great life already
and I believe the universe is actually a simulation with a purpose
there is a next world to come
so when I get up in the morning, I am happy, I enjoy life, every day is a gift
God has smiled on me, I have had a great life already
and I believe the universe is actually a simulation with a purpose
there is a next world to come
so when I get up in the morning, I am happy, I enjoy life, every day is a gift
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Rejecting Institutions
2014 Malice:
Why I won't vote this year – or any year
Why I won't vote this year – or any year
State action proceeds independently of any democratic justification. The purest example of this could be seen during the 2012 Democratic Convention. Los Angeles mayor Antonio Villaraigosa sought to amend the party platform to include a reference to God and to acknowledge Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. He put the edit to the convention floor, seeking to approve the change via acclamation. Having failed to receive the outcome he sought, he asked for a revote. Then he tried again. Finally, he simply pretended that those in the audience – unanimously Democrats and democrats – had agreed with him.
George W Bush did the same thing when he sought United Nations authority to invade Iraq in 2003. Having seen that the votes were not there, he simply grounded his invasion in earlier resolutions.
A party platform is a minor matter. War – solely government’s purview – is far more serious. Yet in both cases the vote was a formality; an ex-post-facto justification for an organization to do whatever it intended to do anyway.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Rejecting Institutions
https://thenationalpulse.com/analysis/c ... oll-fraud/
Lies. Damn lies and statistics ... or biased polls.
Whatever.
Lies. Damn lies and statistics ... or biased polls.
Whatever.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Rejecting Institutions
DBTrek wrote: ↑Thu Apr 29, 2021 9:47 amhttps://thenationalpulse.com/analysis/c ... oll-fraud/
Lies. Damn lies and statistics ... or biased polls.
Whatever.
It's all engineered brother. Gotta reassure the echo chamber it was as wonderful as they thought.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 2443
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:10 am
Re: Rejecting Institutions
Obama: I'm not a king.Fife wrote: ↑Thu Apr 29, 2021 8:59 am2014 Malice:
Why I won't vote this year – or any year
State action proceeds independently of any democratic justification. The purest example of this could be seen during the 2012 Democratic Convention. Los Angeles mayor Antonio Villaraigosa sought to amend the party platform to include a reference to God and to acknowledge Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. He put the edit to the convention floor, seeking to approve the change via acclamation. Having failed to receive the outcome he sought, he asked for a revote. Then he tried again. Finally, he simply pretended that those in the audience – unanimously Democrats and democrats – had agreed with him.
George W Bush did the same thing when he sought United Nations authority to invade Iraq in 2003. Having seen that the votes were not there, he simply grounded his invasion in earlier resolutions.
A party platform is a minor matter. War – solely government’s purview – is far more serious. Yet in both cases the vote was a formality; an ex-post-facto justification for an organization to do whatever it intended to do anyway.
Enact reform via executive action.