Excatly.Kath wrote:Truly a first world problem.
People are lonely because they choose to be.
And American black people who live in a "hood culture", do that because they choose so. The opiod crisis is people choosing to dispense and consuming more opiods. Victimhood culture exists because people choose to see most interactions as an interaction between an aggressor and victim. Poor public education exists because someone chose and still choose the system to be that way. Every single problem in your society exists because someone/some group chose it should be so.
Why choose those things, then?
Some degree of curiousity about why people choose to do something that is either self-destructive or to society at large, is probably healthy, no? If more people are lonely, that's entirely on them to fix, correct. But why would more people choose it in the first place? What brought on the change? While the US isn't Japan, they have this in an extreme degree in Japan. Men and women don't even dare date, and foreswear sex and reproduction. A happy people is, ultimatively, a more productive and wealth-generating one. Ignore DB's claims of victimhood, and don't see it as a sympathy issue. See it as an economic one. Does society benefit more from having more people socially capable of working well together, or does it benefit from people who isolate themselves completely from social interaction, gazing into their own navels?