European displacement prof, or shamed racist?

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: European displacement prof, or shamed racist?

Post by DBTrek » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:20 am

Fife wrote:
Have you been to Coeur d'Alene?
No.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: European displacement prof, or shamed racist?

Post by Fife » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:22 am

DBTrek wrote:
Fife wrote:
Have you been to Coeur d'Alene?
No.
It was July when I was there, and it was absolutely fantastic. February.... iunno.

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: European displacement prof, or shamed racist?

Post by DBTrek » Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:42 am

Anyone shocked that absolutely no media outlets have taken this professor up on her offer to have an in-depth dialogue about the displacement of European Americans?

So many outlets carried the “Racist professor tells Asian Americans to go back to home country” headline ... no one wants to offer her a little more rope? I mean, if “go home” gets your media outlet some clicks, what would 30 moms of “whites being genocided by immigration” get you?

Or ... maybe they fear the message would resonate with more people than it enrages. I guess we’ll never know. A missed opportunity for sure, to take the emotional temperature of the nation on a topic that keeps cropping up.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

Viktorthepirate
Posts: 705
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2017 7:24 pm

Re: European displacement prof, or shamed racist?

Post by Viktorthepirate » Fri Mar 09, 2018 10:16 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Viktorthepirate wrote:
Montegriffo wrote: You can be pretty sure that there are a lot of British Muslims under surveillance.
Why?
Why can you be sure?
For a start they tell us there are up to 300 under constant surveillance. 12 men on each of the 300. That's a lot of man power.
A lot of the mosques will be watched too.
Terrorism is taken very seriously and the IRA gave our security services 30 years of practice.
Figures were out today and arrests of suspected terrorists are at a new record high.
The number of arrests for terror offences in the UK has risen almost 70 per cent in a year to a record high.

New statistics released by the Home Office show there were 379 arrests in the year to June, compared to 226 in the previous 12 months.

It is the highest number of terror arrests on record, coming in the period that saw four attacks hit London and Manchester.
Of the 379 arrests made nationwide, just under a third resulted in a charge and half the suspects were released.

The vast majority of those detained were men, aged over 30, British and of an Asian ethnic appearance, although more than a third of those detained were white.

Fifty-four female terror suspects were arrested – the largest proportion on record – and 17 of those held were aged under 18.

More than three quarters were categorised as “international” terrorists, indicating they were linked to or motivated by a foreign group such as Isis.

More than 30 of the prosecuted terror suspects have so far been found guilty and dozens of cases remain ongoing, while there are more than 200 convicted terrorists already in prison.

The Home Office said that the vast majority – 91 per cent – of those in custody held Islamist extremist views, while 5 per cent were from the far-right.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/cr ... 45996.html
Thanks for in depth response.

I was just curious if there was some kind of correlation between that group of people and danger to the public good that the government saw.

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: European displacement prof, or shamed racist?

Post by Okeefenokee » Fri Mar 09, 2018 11:22 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Okeefenokee wrote:
Viktorthepirate wrote:
Arrested?
They don't have freedom of speech.
No freedom to intimidate.
Fucking spineless.

Don't ever call us to save you again.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: European displacement prof, or shamed racist?

Post by Montegriffo » Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:41 pm

Viktorthepirate wrote:
Montegriffo wrote:
Viktorthepirate wrote:
Why?
Why can you be sure?
For a start they tell us there are up to 300 under constant surveillance. 12 men on each of the 300. That's a lot of man power.
A lot of the mosques will be watched too.
Terrorism is taken very seriously and the IRA gave our security services 30 years of practice.
Figures were out today and arrests of suspected terrorists are at a new record high.
The number of arrests for terror offences in the UK has risen almost 70 per cent in a year to a record high.

New statistics released by the Home Office show there were 379 arrests in the year to June, compared to 226 in the previous 12 months.

It is the highest number of terror arrests on record, coming in the period that saw four attacks hit London and Manchester.
Of the 379 arrests made nationwide, just under a third resulted in a charge and half the suspects were released.

The vast majority of those detained were men, aged over 30, British and of an Asian ethnic appearance, although more than a third of those detained were white.

Fifty-four female terror suspects were arrested – the largest proportion on record – and 17 of those held were aged under 18.

More than three quarters were categorised as “international” terrorists, indicating they were linked to or motivated by a foreign group such as Isis.

More than 30 of the prosecuted terror suspects have so far been found guilty and dozens of cases remain ongoing, while there are more than 200 convicted terrorists already in prison.

The Home Office said that the vast majority – 91 per cent – of those in custody held Islamist extremist views, while 5 per cent were from the far-right.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/cr ... 45996.html
Thanks for in depth response.

I was just curious if there was some kind of correlation between that group of people and danger to the public good that the government saw.
Not sure I understand the question.
Obviously the Govt sees a danger to the public good after the London and Manchester attacks. The increase in arrests for suspected terrorism is directly linked to those attacks.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

nmoore63
Posts: 1881
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:10 pm

Re: European displacement prof, or shamed racist?

Post by nmoore63 » Fri Mar 09, 2018 12:48 pm

What in the fuck is "no freedom to intimate.'

Fucking math is intimidating to a huge chunk of the populous.

Best shut that shit down.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: European displacement prof, or shamed racist?

Post by Montegriffo » Fri Mar 09, 2018 2:42 pm

Just try putting yourself or your kid into the girl's situation. It's not hard to imagine her fearing for her safety. I'd call that intimidation.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Hanarchy Montanarchy
Posts: 5991
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am

Re: European displacement prof, or shamed racist?

Post by Hanarchy Montanarchy » Fri Mar 09, 2018 2:48 pm

The question that has plagued jurists since the start of civilization:

How much of a total dick do you have to be before you are a criminal dick?
HAIL!

Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: European displacement prof, or shamed racist?

Post by Montegriffo » Fri Mar 09, 2018 2:54 pm

Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:The question that has plagued jurists since the start of civilization:

How much of a total dick do you have to be before you are a criminal dick?
Still no news of any charges so it's possible they didn't think they had enough for a successful prosecution.
Early days yet though...
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image