Agreed. We don't need no stinkin' moderation. I welcome our spambot overlords.Fife wrote:
It's the tin star I have no time for.
Random Olympics discussion
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Random Olympics discussion
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 4050
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:13 pm
- Location: Canadastan
Re: Random Olympics discussion
When can we expect the arrival of these ice zombies?Kath wrote:Agreed. We don't need no stinkin' moderation. I welcome our spambot overlords.
Deep down tho, I still thirst to kill you and eat you. Ultra Chimp can't help it.. - Smitty
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Random Olympics discussion
Already here.DrYouth wrote:When can we expect the arrival of these ice zombies?Kath wrote:Agreed. We don't need no stinkin' moderation. I welcome our spambot overlords.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Random Olympics discussion
About 75% of recently started, non Martin generated threads have spam in them. Where have you been?DrYouth wrote:When can we expect the arrival of these ice zombies?Kath wrote:Agreed. We don't need no stinkin' moderation. I welcome our spambot overlords.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Random Olympics discussion
You want us banned? Fine every one of your threads is going to get jacked by hockey talk now, you're either with us or against us, and you want the moderator to censor us, so fuck you and the horse you rode in on.PartyOf5 wrote:So ban him for a week. If he comes back and does ti some more, then ban him for a longer period of time.
I was initially on Capps side about censoring, but if he's going to intentionally (and repeatedly) come into the store and wreck shit, then throw his ass out. I about ready to give up on this place. It takes me twice as long to wade through vague thread titles to find stuff, and then half of those are filled with pages upon pages of off topic shit posting.
Kath, you are a mod, please act like the adult in the room since you were given the title. Creating a new thread every day for Olympics discussion is making it a mess to keep up any of it.
This is LIberty Nation, if you don't like it, you can get out.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Random Olympics discussion
If Capps goes I go, so if you're banning Capps, ban me too, Sally.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Random Olympics discussion
If Smitty goes I go, so if you're banning Smitty, ban me too, Kiddie Porn Kath.Smitty-48 wrote:If Capps goes I go, so if you're banning Capps, ban me too, Sally.
Also locking threads is censorship, and Child Porn Sally keeps reaching new lows, reaching for more and more ways to steer the forum into discussing what she wants to discuss by force. Guess she still doesn't understand Hash when he said no rules, and she never will.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Random Olympics discussion
The hockey talk faction is certainly well aware, fuck all of Kath's safe spaces, and fuck the whinny little bitches who want us banned too. We won't let her or her fellow Censorship Cunts dictate what content is and isn't acceptable around here, the harder they try, the harder they'll fail.Smitty-48 wrote:Sally needs her safe space, who knew?
*yip*
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Random Olympics discussion
Go ahead and ban me, whatever, I'm here for Marty Hash until he asks me to leave, if he doesn't want Smitty around, just say so.
Nec Aspera Terrent