Top British Female Journalist Mentally Destroyed by Cyberbullying, Forced to Call in Security

[Montegriffo]

Britain is not the country which has a leader openly calling for censorship of the press and excluding critical journalists from press conferences.

Just people who can't take a joke who can't admit they are lefty assholes and like "backwards 5 year olds"

Jokes are meant to be funny. All you are is spiteful and boringly repetitive. You don't agree with me, that's fine, just stop avoiding debate in favour of spreading lies and insults. If you can't argue over the issues and the only weapons you have in your armoury is to falsly accuse me of child fucking and being a lefty then just ignore me. If you can (which you have yet to prove) then address the points I've made about Trump attacking the freedom of the press.

[C-Mag]

If you took a hugely persuasive demagogue like Peterson but gave him the political aspirations of somebody like Richard Spencer... watch out.

Mmmmmmmmmmm........ I'm not sure...... Oh well, that's Cannuckistan's problem not mine.

[Speaker to Animals]

If you took a hugely persuasive demagogue like Peterson but gave him the political aspirations of somebody like Richard Spencer... watch out.

Mmmmmmmmmmm........ I'm not sure...... Oh well, that's Cannuckistan's problem not mine.

How much of his content have you watched?

What I see is a guy who inflicts extreme feelings of inadequacy and failure, while offering to help people overcome that failure (sort themselves out) if they follow him. It's incredibly manipulative.

The scariest part about it is that he has already told people what he is. He warns people about himself all the time.

He comes across to me as a guy who has the capabilities of dangerous sociopath, but he has a conscience, so he just limits himself to selling courses and building a large cult-like following. But maybe he is just manipulating people about the conscience too.

[C-Mag]

I've only watched several of the videos posted here.

'inflicts extreme feelings of inadequacy and failure'............... Meh, he's not as harsh as dealing with the collective group of predatory assholes here at MHF. So he nails the SJWs on the fallacies of their arguments. If they can't handle it so what.

I don't find him dangerous to society in any way, he is dangerous to the SJW crowd and Liberals in general that he has made an art of destroying. But lets face it, SJWs need to come up with better arguments.

[Speaker to Animals]

I've only watched several of the videos posted here.

'inflicts extreme feelings of inadequacy and failure'............... Meh, he's not as harsh as dealing with the collective group of predatory assholes here at MHF. So he nails the SJWs on the fallacies of their arguments. If they can't handle it so what.

I don't find him dangerous to society in any way, he is dangerous to the SJW crowd and Liberals in general that he has made an art of destroying. But lets face it, SJWs need to come up with better arguments.

Oh, yes he is. He is quite effective at making people feel inadequate so that they follow him (and send him money) to "sort themselves out". This is a cult.

[nmoore63]

I'm sure the cyberbullies went too far but...

I'm not sure how people can defend a journalist for being so unprepared for such an interview.

Don't invite a guest on the show,
just to be confrontational with them
only to be dumbfounded when they present their argument to you.

Prep work. Be a professional.

[C-Mag]

I'm sure the cyberbullies went too far but...

I'm not sure how people can defend a journalist for being so unprepared for such an interview.

Don't invite a guest on the show,
just to be confrontational with them
only to be dumbfounded when they present their argument to you.

Prep work. Be a professional.

+1

Newman put on the stiff upper lip after this............. but she ran back to her employer, a man, for protection.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

So he nails the SJWs on the fallacies of their arguments.

Does he though?

He doesn't really address any of the interesting things you could argue about when it comes to language and gender and the specifics of English grammar, or even the subjective experience of identity.

I mean, he seems to be adequately pro- free speech, but that is pretty low hanging fruit when it comes to 'nailing' the SJWs.

Rather cynical self-help guru making fast cash on atomized millennials makes more sense than brave slayer of the lefts sacred cows when you really look at most of JP's positions.

[Martin Hash]

Rather cynical self-help guru making fast cash on atomized millennials makes more sense than brave slayer of the lefts sacred cows when you really look at most of JP's positions.

Wow, what are you, a Buddhist?

BTW, Scott Adams knows more about life than you do too.

[Speaker to Animals]

So he nails the SJWs on the fallacies of their arguments.

Does he though?

He doesn't really address any of the interesting things you could argue about when it comes to language and gender and the specifics of English grammar, or even the subjective experience of identity.

I mean, he seems to be adequately pro- free speech, but that is pretty low hanging fruit when it comes to 'nailing' the SJWs.

Rather cynical self-help guru making fast cash on atomized millennials makes more sense than brave slayer of the lefts sacred cows when you really look at most of JP's positions.

He's not even pro-free speech. He's for free speech for himself and his friends, but he had no trouble whatsoever deplatforming somebody he didn't agree with -- at a free speech event.