-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Wed Aug 02, 2017 8:17 am
DBTrek wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:I think you have Mammon reversed...
That would be consistent with your complete inability to read and process simple sentences.
"Either way, lolberts are going to bitch and moan because it's heresy in their Mammon religion. Fuck 'em. Seriously. Fuck those guys. They are a pain in the ass and have zero solutions worth the time to consider. The only thing they do is countersignal common sense."
So... libertarians are haters of wealth?
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Wed Aug 02, 2017 8:19 am
No. It's not a subjective opinion. If you had an argument, you'd post it. But you don't so you can't.
I just presented an alternative to the UBI. I am not married to the idea of a UBI. But you buried that too.
In fact, all you have done is buried every single attempt at discussing this issue rationally with insults and childishness. We can't even have an adult discussion about it because of your behavior.
-
DBTrek
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Post
by DBTrek » Wed Aug 02, 2017 8:21 am
GrumpyCatFace wrote:So... libertarians are haters of wealth?
Doubling down I see.
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Wed Aug 02, 2017 8:24 am
DBTrek wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:So... libertarians are haters of wealth?
Doubling down I see.
it's your argument, I'm just trying to make sense of it. So far, you're being incredibly obtuse, and I'm losing interest.
-
DBTrek
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Post
by DBTrek » Wed Aug 02, 2017 8:25 am
Speaker to Animals wrote:No. It's not a subjective opinion. If you had an argument, you'd post it. But you don't so you can't.
I just presented an alternative to the UBI. I am not married to the idea of a UBI. But you buried that too.
In fact, all you have done is buried every single attempt at discussing this issue rationally with insults and childishness. We can't even have an adult discussion about it because of your behavior.
We're actually discussing
*right now*, so the idea that I've somehow terminated all discussion is laughable. I also don't have any problem with your proposed space program as an alternative to crushing the human spirit and destroying human connections via UBI. It doesn't take much to improve on a disaster like UBI, so your one paragraph musing certainly qualifies as an improvement.
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Wed Aug 02, 2017 8:26 am
No. We are discussing the future, DB. You are trying to deflect again. I don't see half the population out of work, do you?
-
DBTrek
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Post
by DBTrek » Wed Aug 02, 2017 8:28 am
GrumpyCatFace wrote:it's your argument, I'm just trying to make sense of it. So far, you're being incredibly obtuse, and I'm losing interest.
The definition of Mammon is right in your face, and you can't comprehend it.
StA is hardly the first to use a Mammon reference, so there's 2000+ years of Mammon references you can google if you want to see the historical context and the ideas it is leveraged against. But you're not interested in anything that resembles gaining understanding or doing the work of research. Instead, you want me to waste time arguing your ignorance with you, and I'm not interested. You don't understand the usage of Mammon. Great. Only one of a nigh infinite number of things you don't understand. I'm good with it.
-
DBTrek
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Post
by DBTrek » Wed Aug 02, 2017 8:31 am
When StA gets around to saying something instead of copy/pasting "deflecting" like an autist let me know.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Stimulus.
"DEFLECTING! DERP!"
Stimulus.
"DEFLECTING! DERP!"
Stimulus.
"DEFLECTING! DERP!"
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Wed Aug 02, 2017 8:41 am
DBTrek wrote:GrumpyCatFace wrote:it's your argument, I'm just trying to make sense of it. So far, you're being incredibly obtuse, and I'm losing interest.
The definition of Mammon is right in your face, and you can't comprehend it.
StA is hardly the first to use a Mammon reference, so there's 2000+ years of Mammon references you can google if you want to see the historical context and the ideas it is leveraged against. But you're not interested in anything that resembles gaining understanding or doing the work of research. Instead, you want me to waste time arguing your ignorance with you, and I'm not interested. You don't understand the usage of Mammon. Great. Only one of a nigh infinite number of things you don't understand. I'm good with it.
Right on, you showed me.
Waiting on your meds this week?
-
DBTrek
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Post
by DBTrek » Wed Aug 02, 2017 8:46 am
Med free, unlike
70% of the rest of you.
Might explain why I can understand simple sentences and refute obvious boondoggles while so many here are struggling.
Maybe get yourself off your own pharmaceutical crutches and see if it helps any.