UN drafts proposal for replacement immigration

[StCapps]

Well this is a productive way to rationalize designed demographic replacement. Voting doesn't matter on this issue.

Looks like the birth rates of the non-white world will catch up soon enough according to those projections of yours. So you and the other immigration chicken little's can simmer right down about the invading Islamic hordes ieady, because apparently they won't be able to replace themselves either.

[TheReal_ND]

Ok Canada

100,000,000 Canadians by 2100! A tripling of Canada’s population over the next eight decades is the objective of a new organization, the Century Initiative. Canada needs to “get bigger, a lot bigger,” says one of the organization’s leaders.

It’s a long shot, that 100 million.

But a report Thursday from the Trudeau government’s Advisory Council on Economic Growth boldly proposes that Canada boost annual immigration to 450,000. While the council stopped short of mentioning a target, immigration at that rate would easily propel Canada to 100 million before the end of the 21st century.

http://business.financialpost.com/fp-co ... -only-hope

[StCapps]

Ok Canada

100,000,000 Canadians by 2100! A tripling of Canada’s population over the next eight decades is the objective of a new organization, the Century Initiative. Canada needs to “get bigger, a lot bigger,” says one of the organization’s leaders.

It’s a long shot, that 100 million.

But a report Thursday from the Trudeau government’s Advisory Council on Economic Growth boldly proposes that Canada boost annual immigration to 450,000. While the council stopped short of mentioning a target, immigration at that rate would easily propel Canada to 100 million before the end of the 21st century.

http://business.financialpost.com/fp-co ... -only-hope

Nonsense Clickbait. It would be quite a feat if Canada got up to a population of 70 million by 2100. 100 million is pure fantasy. We aren't going to bring in 450,000+ immigrants for eight decades straight, never gonna happen.

[TheReal_ND]

never going to happen

It could

Anyway, that's what the proposal was. Much like the UN proposal that Bjorn is playing word games with me over.

[StCapps]

never going to happen

It could

Anyway, that's what the proposal was. Much like the UN proposal that Bjorn is playing word games with me over.

Might as well be written on toilet paper. Canada hasn't even let in 450,000 immigrant yet in a single year and you think projections based on that happening for eight straight decades are going to pan out?

[Speaker to Animals]

[heydaralon]

In particular, the ostensible justification for the demographic replacement of whites in their own countries makes no rational sense. We know that technological innovation and automation are making increasingly more jobs irrelevant.

On the one hand, the globalists and their leftist twat allies are screeching that there are too many people; we need eugenics and population controls yesterday! On the other hand, they are telling us that we need to accept mass migration from incompatible cultures because we are not producing enough children.

The dialectical synthesis of their reasoning (and yeah, they do think this way) is that they want whites to not reproduce while they import countless nonwhites into Europe and North America. The globalists want this because they want a more controllable population with less agency. The marxists want this because they want to exterminate whites. This has been going on since the Clinton administration, but really it began with George H.W. Bush. Bush tried and failed to usher in the NWO. Clinton made it a reality.

Every president since has fallen in line with it. Now even Trump succumbed to it for some reason.


This is the essence of globalism. This is what the NWO is all about.

This. 100%. We should be trying to figure out how to run societies with lower numbers, since many jobs will become automated. Europe's declining birthrates perfectly set it up for this. I'm not so sure now. If Japan keeps doing what its doing, and keeps its birthrate low, it will probably weather the automation storm just fine. I think we may be fucked. South Africa might be a good case study to what the West looks like in the future. Color me unimpressed.

[Ph64]

In particular, the ostensible justification for the demographic replacement of whites in their own countries makes no rational sense. We know that technological innovation and automation are making increasingly more jobs irrelevant.

On the one hand, the globalists and their leftist twat allies are screeching that there are too many people; we need eugenics and population controls yesterday! On the other hand, they are telling us that we need to accept mass migration from incompatible cultures because we are not producing enough children.

The dialectical synthesis of their reasoning (and yeah, they do think this way) is that they want whites to not reproduce while they import countless nonwhites into Europe and North America. The globalists want this because they want a more controllable population with less agency. The marxists want this because they want to exterminate whites. This has been going on since the Clinton administration, but really it began with George H.W. Bush. Bush tried and failed to usher in the NWO. Clinton made it a reality.

Every president since has fallen in line with it. Now even Trump succumbed to it for some reason.


This is the essence of globalism. This is what the NWO is all about.

This. 100%. We should be trying to figure out how to run societies with lower numbers, since many jobs will become automated. Europe's declining birthrates perfectly set it up for this. I'm not so sure now. If Japan keeps doing what its doing, and keeps its birthrate low, it will probably weather the automation storm just fine. I think we may be fucked. South Africa might be a good case study to what the West looks like in the future. Color me unimpressed.

Yup. If we know that automation is going to eliminate jobs, wouldn't less births be a positive, less unemployment, less people needing "aid" meaning lower budget for such things, etc? Why do we need *more* people when we're already over 40% on food stamps (or EBT now) of some kind?

If other countries are increasing in population, why is that our problem? Why do we want them to move here and bring their problems here? (Same for Europe)

If, "according to the Fed/BLS" (arguably false), unemployment is under 5% and we are at "full employment", with a slew of people "not in the labor pool" (many because they can't find work and dropped off the "unemployed" rolls), why do we need more people? If you argue many of those "out of the labor pool" people are unqualified for the jobs needed... why import more possibly poorly educated people who maybe don't even know the local language? As if they're going to be more qualified?

There's no jobs for them where they are, and declining jobs (and/or "full employment") here would indicate we don't need them here - unless you want them to drive down wages or drive up the numbers of people for assistance programs.

Europe is seeing this - few of the "refugees" are highly trained/skilled people, so they cost the existing taxpaying population a fortune, few are qualified to fill jobs... why import a burden on your existing population in a world which is already having global financial problems?