Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
As long as we are overturning Roe v. Wade.. it's all good.
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
The candidate who can get 60 votes is prolly gonna be a neocon wet dream.
Some election "victory," eh.
Some election "victory," eh.
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Yes. Let's have women dying in back alleys again. That will be fantastic!Speaker to Animals wrote:As long as we are overturning Roe v. Wade.. it's all good.
Oh, wait, you probably mean that. You hate women. The less, the better, amiright?
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Kath wrote:Yes. Let's have women dying in back alleys again. That will be fantastic!Speaker to Animals wrote:As long as we are overturning Roe v. Wade.. it's all good.
Oh, wait, you probably mean that. You hate women. The less, the better, amiright?
Then don't try to kill your babies, I guess?
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Unfortunately, that is probably true. We need a Nick Gillespie or Lisa Kennedy type Liberty minded person on the bench.Fife wrote:The candidate who can get 60 votes is prolly gonna be a neocon wet dream.
Some election "victory," eh.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Kath wrote:Yes. Let's have women dying in back alleys again. That will be fantastic!Speaker to Animals wrote:As long as we are overturning Roe v. Wade.. it's all good.
Oh, wait, you probably mean that. You hate women. The less, the better, amiright?
It's hard to rank the worst SCOTUS opinion of all time; there are a few to choose from. Of the ones that are still good law, Roe has to be in the top 3.
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
I actually would like to see the SCOTUS take on and re-balance the roles and responsibilities of men in women in parenting first. It takes two to make a baby, each party should have equal responsibility in what happens from conception to adulthood.Speaker to Animals wrote:Kath wrote:Yes. Let's have women dying in back alleys again. That will be fantastic!Speaker to Animals wrote:As long as we are overturning Roe v. Wade.. it's all good.
Oh, wait, you probably mean that. You hate women. The less, the better, amiright?
Then don't try to kill your babies, I guess?
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Think that through for a minute. What kind of case would that be, and how would the opinion be presented? Defeating the abomination of Roe doesn't mean out-Heroding Herod.C-Mag wrote:I actually would like to see the SCOTUS take on and re-balance the roles and responsibilities of men in women in parenting first. It takes two to make a baby, each party should have equal responsibility in what happens from conception to adulthood.Speaker to Animals wrote:Kath wrote: Yes. Let's have women dying in back alleys again. That will be fantastic!
Oh, wait, you probably mean that. You hate women. The less, the better, amiright?
Then don't try to kill your babies, I guess?
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
My wet dream for SCOTUS is to make the 4th Amendment relevant again. And civil forfeiture must die.
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Well I'm certainly on board with all that.Kath wrote:My wet dream for SCOTUS is to make the 4th Amendment relevant again. And civil forfeiture must die.
One of the uncountable losses of the destruction of the DCF was the links I worked up on the Mosaic Theory.
Your 4th amendment is on life 12.75, or thereabouts.
Scientists are making genetically modified cyborg dragonflies