[s]YouTube stuff[/s] cancelled

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:06 am

Impeachment is perfectly constitutional.
In fact, it is right there article II, section 4
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Withholding funds unless an investigation into the actions of a possible Presidential rival is carried out comes under the heading of bribery if proved.
At this point, the impeachment process is an investigation into alleged lawbreaking by Trump and perfectly constitutional.
It's doomed, obviously, as a partisan Senate acts as the jury and around 20 Republican Senators have to vote against their own self-interest in order to remove Trump from office.
What you are railing against is an investigation into alleged wrongdoings by
Trump.
To not investigate those allegations would be unconstitutional and lead to the President being above the law. Otherwise known as totalitarian government.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by DBTrek » Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:40 am




The dude in the nation that still can’t Brexit after the people spoke in 2016 is gonna lecture us about totalitarianism now.
:think:
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Speaker to Animals » Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:52 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:06 am
Impeachment is perfectly constitutional.
In fact, it is right there article II, section 4
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Withholding funds unless an investigation into the actions of a possible Presidential rival is carried out comes under the heading of bribery if proved.
At this point, the impeachment process is an investigation into alleged lawbreaking by Trump and perfectly constitutional.
It's doomed, obviously, as a partisan Senate acts as the jury and around 20 Republican Senators have to vote against their own self-interest in order to remove Trump from office.
What you are railing against is an investigation into alleged wrongdoings by
Trump.
To not investigate those allegations would be unconstitutional and lead to the President being above the law. Otherwise known as totalitarian government.
Read your quote. Making up some asinine opinion of what he did being illegal does not constitute conviction of. We spent the past two years of the democrats spending millions of dollars trying to convict the man on literally anything, and they failed. Which was amazing, by the way. I cannot imagine a president since Jimmy Carter who would have survived that shit without at least a charge, if not a conviction. LOL
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:53 am

DBTrek wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:40 am



The dude in the nation that still can’t Brexit after the people spoke in 2016 is gonna lecture us about totalitarianism now.
:think:
Define Brexit.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:56 am

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:52 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:06 am
Impeachment is perfectly constitutional.
In fact, it is right there article II, section 4
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Withholding funds unless an investigation into the actions of a possible Presidential rival is carried out comes under the heading of bribery if proved.
At this point, the impeachment process is an investigation into alleged lawbreaking by Trump and perfectly constitutional.
It's doomed, obviously, as a partisan Senate acts as the jury and around 20 Republican Senators have to vote against their own self-interest in order to remove Trump from office.
What you are railing against is an investigation into alleged wrongdoings by
Trump.
To not investigate those allegations would be unconstitutional and lead to the President being above the law. Otherwise known as totalitarian government.
Read your quote.
How do you arrive at a conviction without an investigation?
Also, how do you get a conviction with a jury biased in favour of the accused?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by StCapps » Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:59 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:53 am
DBTrek wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:40 am



The dude in the nation that still can’t Brexit after the people spoke in 2016 is gonna lecture us about totalitarianism now.
:think:
Define Brexit.
Leaving the EU.
*yip*

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:04 am

StCapps wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:59 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:53 am
DBTrek wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:40 am



The dude in the nation that still can’t Brexit after the people spoke in 2016 is gonna lecture us about totalitarianism now.
:think:
Define Brexit.
Leaving the EU.
Leaving with a deal or without a deal?
Norway style or Switzerland style?
Staying in the single market as was campaigned for or crashing out and breaking all links which nobody (even Farage) campaigned for?

Pro-Brexit voters can't agree what Brexit means which makes it difficult to achieve.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by StCapps » Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:08 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:04 am
StCapps wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:59 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:53 am


Define Brexit.
Leaving the EU.
Leaving with a deal or without a deal?
Norway style or Switzerland style?
Staying in the single market as was campaigned for or crashing out and breaking all links which nobody (even Farage) campaigned for?

Pro-Brexit voters can't agree what Brexit means which makes it difficult to achieve.
You don't need a deal before you leave to get a deal after you leave. Just Leave, stop the feckless delaying.
*yip*

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by Speaker to Animals » Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:10 am

Montegriffo wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:56 am
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:52 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:06 am
Impeachment is perfectly constitutional.
In fact, it is right there article II, section 4


Withholding funds unless an investigation into the actions of a possible Presidential rival is carried out comes under the heading of bribery if proved.
At this point, the impeachment process is an investigation into alleged lawbreaking by Trump and perfectly constitutional.
It's doomed, obviously, as a partisan Senate acts as the jury and around 20 Republican Senators have to vote against their own self-interest in order to remove Trump from office.
What you are railing against is an investigation into alleged wrongdoings by
Trump.
To not investigate those allegations would be unconstitutional and lead to the President being above the law. Otherwise known as totalitarian government.
Read your quote.
How do you arrive at a conviction without an investigation?
Also, how do you get a conviction with a jury biased in favour of the accused?
Jesus Christ.

There WAS an investigation and they found NOTHING.

User avatar
DBTrek
Posts: 12241
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm

Re: YouTube stuff

Post by DBTrek » Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:14 am

Monte: DEFINE BREXIT!!!

Capps: Leaving the EU.

Monte: Uhhhh ... but ... whaddabout ... uhhh ... ummm ...

:lol:

Image
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"