TheReal_ND wrote:What is the cat looking at the ducklings thinking?
Habbening Thread
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Habbening Thread
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Habbening Thread
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Habbening Thread
I am curious. What is the point in engaging in a forum where people are supposed to exchange ideas and arguments when all you do when confronted with an argument you do not like, and for which you can't seem to produce a counterargument, is to flood the thread with cat pictures so as to somehow pretend like the argument was never made?
It's insulting and childlike.
GCF and Monty obviously have no legitimate counterargument. They cannot defend the mass migration policies of Muslims from the developing world into western nations. So all they have left is this. Pathetic.
It's insulting and childlike.
GCF and Monty obviously have no legitimate counterargument. They cannot defend the mass migration policies of Muslims from the developing world into western nations. So all they have left is this. Pathetic.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Habbening Thread
It's a question of standards. If we want a forum where people honestly engage in debate, then this kind of behavior should be frowned upon. These two have shown they can offer nothing to this thread, and in true SJW fashion, they seek to do what is the equivalent of shouting down arguments they don't like but to which they have no idea how to rationally respond.
If you can't form a counterargument, then maybe fuck off? You really insult every person in this forum when you try to shut down debate like this.
If you can't form a counterargument, then maybe fuck off? You really insult every person in this forum when you try to shut down debate like this.
Last edited by Speaker to Animals on Fri Dec 23, 2016 12:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3350
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:00 pm
Re: Habbening Thread
To go back to the OP, I do find talking about TV a hobby. Sort of like posting here is sort of like another hobby in itself.
-
- Posts: 25279
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Habbening Thread
Tried to debate honestly with you and you proved incapable. Lies about Christians being stoned and more lies about no go areas and Sharia, therefore........
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Habbening Thread
You did not once attempt to debate honestly. You lost the debate and so your only recourse was to do the equivalent of shouting down the debate so nobody can read the arguments you failed to refute. You lost and this kind of shoddy behavior is all you have left. It's weak and pathetic.
You should know when you resort to this, you essentially lose. You were confronted with an argument. You failed to refute or even address it. You attempted to bury said argument under a pile of cat pics in the hopes that nobody will notice that you lost.
That's what you are doing right now.
You should know when you resort to this, you essentially lose. You were confronted with an argument. You failed to refute or even address it. You attempted to bury said argument under a pile of cat pics in the hopes that nobody will notice that you lost.
That's what you are doing right now.
-
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Re: Habbening Thread
25 years ago on the 26th, when the USSR went belly up.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.