Trump's SCOTUS

User avatar
Hanarchy Montanarchy
Posts: 5991
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Hanarchy Montanarchy » Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:42 am

The Conservative wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:37 am
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:26 am
Just to be clear, this is an argument against interest.

I very much want Trump to make a nomination, fill the bench, and then lose the 2020 race.
I'm not sure he will lose. As somoene said before, I can run faster scared than you angry. Which basically means the DNC is angry, the RNC is scared... I think the people of the RNC will consolodate better in fear of what Biden and ultimately Harris/AOC/etc may do...
That is precisely my point. An open seat animates Trump's voters more than Biden's, who are already animated against Trump regardless of the the SCOTUS vacancy.
HAIL!

Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen

User avatar
Xenophon
Posts: 2713
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Xenophon » Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:04 am

Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:40 am
Xenophon wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:31 am
With the Left already wargaming a scenario where Trump wins on election night, only to be defeated by Biden as Gandalf returns with absentee ballots to save the day, I think it's a prudent move to go ahead and fill the court.
I think it is absolutely critical that the seat is filled, and that a serious, non-partisan jurist will likely find that the post election-night ballots that come in for Biden are valid votes.

I also have no reason to believe Trump will pick an un-serious, partisan jurist, given the two picks he has already had - so, yeah, absolutely, fill the seat.
There is no such thing.

User avatar
Hanarchy Montanarchy
Posts: 5991
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Hanarchy Montanarchy » Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:12 am

Xenophon wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 10:04 am
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:40 am
Xenophon wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:31 am
With the Left already wargaming a scenario where Trump wins on election night, only to be defeated by Biden as Gandalf returns with absentee ballots to save the day, I think it's a prudent move to go ahead and fill the court.
I think it is absolutely critical that the seat is filled, and that a serious, non-partisan jurist will likely find that the post election-night ballots that come in for Biden are valid votes.

I also have no reason to believe Trump will pick an un-serious, partisan jurist, given the two picks he has already had - so, yeah, absolutely, fill the seat.
There is no such thing.
That is certainly what the Dems think, which is why they don't want to give Trump another nomination.

I'm not so cynical.
HAIL!

Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen

PartyOf5
Posts: 3657
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by PartyOf5 » Tue Sep 22, 2020 11:48 am

Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:42 am
That is precisely my point. An open seat animates Trump's voters more than Biden's, who are already animated against Trump regardless of the the SCOTUS vacancy.
I'm not worried about the animated Biden voters. It's the re-animated ones that worry me. Cemeteries lean heavily Democrat.

User avatar
Xenophon
Posts: 2713
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Xenophon » Tue Sep 22, 2020 11:50 am

PartyOf5 wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 11:48 am
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 9:42 am
That is precisely my point. An open seat animates Trump's voters more than Biden's, who are already animated against Trump regardless of the the SCOTUS vacancy.
I'm not worried about the animated Biden voters. It's the re-animated ones that worry me. Cemeteries lean heavily Democrat.
Martin needs to figure out a way to get a lock on that dead guy vote.

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by C-Mag » Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:05 pm

^^^ +1 ^^^



The Dems don't have a lot of ways to stop the GOP. They will try all kinds of shennanigans to slow the process. Tardiness, drag out discussions, whatever they can to try and force this at least past the election.

I personally don't think the GOP should have hearings, that would be a nightmare, and gives the Dems a chance to roll out fake accusers.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Zlaxer » Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:24 pm

C-Mag wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:05 pm
^^^ +1 ^^^



The Dems don't have a lot of ways to stop the GOP. They will try all kinds of shennanigans to slow the process. Tardiness, drag out discussions, whatever they can to try and force this at least past the election.

I personally don't think the GOP should have hearings, that would be a nightmare, and gives the Dems a chance to roll out fake accusers.

We need to weaponize SCOTUS and the police to make marxism illegal - I don’t give a fuck about McCarthyism - he was fucking right. This cancer on humanity needs to be irritated. Fuck the Constitution - it’s worthless anyways bc only 1 side even tries to follow it. What good is a 1 sided contract? Nothing. What do we have to loose at this point? The left are not your neighbors, they do not share your values or your beliefs...they hate you and would slit your kids throat in a second if it meant more power (don’t forget they’re already shooting conservative children in the head).

Mao is coming for your children.


The legions of useful idiots are sunk costs at this point...

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14790
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by The Conservative » Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:37 pm

Zlaxer wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:24 pm
C-Mag wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:05 pm
^^^ +1 ^^^



The Dems don't have a lot of ways to stop the GOP. They will try all kinds of shennanigans to slow the process. Tardiness, drag out discussions, whatever they can to try and force this at least past the election.

I personally don't think the GOP should have hearings, that would be a nightmare, and gives the Dems a chance to roll out fake accusers.

We need to weaponize SCOTUS and the police to make marxism illegal - I don’t give a fuck about McCarthyism - he was fucking right. This cancer on humanity needs to be irritated. Fuck the Constitution - it’s worthless anyways - what do we have to loose at this point?

Mao is coming for your children.
Actually, if we do it right, we could stay within the consitution's boundries.
#NotOneRedCent

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Zlaxer » Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:40 pm

The Conservative wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:37 pm
Zlaxer wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:24 pm
C-Mag wrote:
Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:05 pm
^^^ +1 ^^^



The Dems don't have a lot of ways to stop the GOP. They will try all kinds of shennanigans to slow the process. Tardiness, drag out discussions, whatever they can to try and force this at least past the election.

I personally don't think the GOP should have hearings, that would be a nightmare, and gives the Dems a chance to roll out fake accusers.

We need to weaponize SCOTUS and the police to make marxism illegal - I don’t give a fuck about McCarthyism - he was fucking right. This cancer on humanity needs to be irritated. Fuck the Constitution - it’s worthless anyways - what do we have to loose at this point?

Mao is coming for your children.
Actually, if we do it right, we could stay within the consitution's boundries.

No - Anyone found to support marxism is prohibited from elected office. Period. Prohibited from teaching in schools (public and private). Prohibited from being on internet tv or radio. That is not in conformance with constitution.

Declare marxists terrorists...

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18721
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Martin Hash » Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:42 pm

This used to be the case.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change