Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:The Conservative wrote:Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
You are morally certain to have idiots behind both.
Statistically.
So why put more restrictions on it if we don't stop morons first?
Regulations and innovations in car safety have reduced car fatalities without reducing the amount of morons.
It's illegal to not wear a seatbelt, yet when someone dies because they don't wear their seatbelt, do we then make it so the cars won't start without someone clicking the seatbelt shut?
Then what happens if someone does that, then just latches it to the seat?
Do we make it so that it won't start unless a part of the seatbelt is extended? Or weight restrictions have to be met? Or both?
See what we are doing here? The more restrictions, the less freedom... the more restrictions the more money it's going to cost to enforce them, and in turn, the cost of cars become outrageous.
There is going to be a point of time where we say "Fuck it, let Darwinism take affect" and we should to... we have become a country of babies because we are afraid to get hurt this day and age. We either learn from our mistakes or not...