Harvey Weinstein: That Time When We Decided To Smash Cultural Marxism Once and for All

[Speaker to Animals]

So the word of a porn actress versus the word of a senator. Interesting to see how that plays out.

People will trust the porn actress more than a congressman. This is the endgame of corruption.

Really, I think this is part of the underground war happening in the halls of power. People are purchasing victim testimonies against their rivals, at a bargain rate.

I'd trust the porn actress before a politician too. I still think you need proof. That photo is not strict proof, since it could have been a joke she was in on, but it looks pretty bad.

How is that even funny?

[SuburbanFarmer]

Accusation comes a day or two after Franken proposed holding companies responsible for social media filtering. Motive, check.

[C-Mag]

It's pretty obvious we need a process to deal with this. Average Men have had to deal with this type of Witch Hunt as Doc says for probably the last 2 decades. Now, the movers and shakers are getting there dose of medicine from the world they created. I say welcome to the party.

The first standard we need to get in place before we take these accusations seriously is the Accuser needs to make a formal Sworn Statement under penalty of Purgy and file the accusation with a court. If they are not willing to do that, they should be viewed with suspicion.

[SuburbanFarmer]

It's pretty obvious we need a process to deal with this. Average Men have had to deal with this type of Witch Hunt as Doc says for probably the last 2 decades. Now, the movers and shakers are getting there dose of medicine from the world they created. I say welcome to the party.

The first standard we need to get in place before we take these accusations seriously is the Accuser needs to make a formal Sworn Statement under penalty of Purgy and file the accusation with a court. If they are not willing to do that, they should be viewed with suspicion.

I am absolutely on board with that. Require a notary public, or something, at least..

[Speaker to Animals]

It's pretty obvious we need a process to deal with this. Average Men have had to deal with this type of Witch Hunt as Doc says for probably the last 2 decades. Now, the movers and shakers are getting there dose of medicine from the world they created. I say welcome to the party.

The first standard we need to get in place before we take these accusations seriously is the Accuser needs to make a formal Sworn Statement under penalty of Purgy and file the accusation with a court. If they are not willing to do that, they should be viewed with suspicion.

Except in many cases the courts will not hold them accountable when it is proven they lied. It's changed a little, but we are still talking about women getting walking away with probation at most.

[nmoore63]

It's pretty obvious we need a process to deal with this. Average Men have had to deal with this type of Witch Hunt as Doc says for probably the last 2 decades. Now, the movers and shakers are getting there dose of medicine from the world they created. I say welcome to the party.

The first standard we need to get in place before we take these accusations seriously is the Accuser needs to make a formal Sworn Statement under penalty of Purgy and file the accusation with a court. If they are not willing to do that, they should be viewed with suspicion.

As this is largely a social/political thing rather than a legal thing, I'm not sure how you get there.

[Fife]

It's pretty obvious we need a process to deal with this. Average Men have had to deal with this type of Witch Hunt as Doc says for probably the last 2 decades. Now, the movers and shakers are getting there dose of medicine from the world they created. I say welcome to the party.

The first standard we need to get in place before we take these accusations seriously is the Accuser needs to make a formal Sworn Statement under penalty of Purgy and file the accusation with a court. If they are not willing to do that, they should be viewed with suspicion.

Prior restraint much, Carlus?

You got catass over there nodding his head furiously. That should be a clue.

[Fife]

It's pretty obvious we need a process to deal with this. Average Men have had to deal with this type of Witch Hunt as Doc says for probably the last 2 decades. Now, the movers and shakers are getting there dose of medicine from the world they created. I say welcome to the party.

The first standard we need to get in place before we take these accusations seriously is the Accuser needs to make a formal Sworn Statement under penalty of Purgy and file the accusation with a court. If they are not willing to do that, they should be viewed with suspicion.

Except in many cases the courts will not hold them accountable when it is proven they lied. It's changed a little, but we are still talking about women getting walking away with probation at most.

Zing! It's *already* agin the law to lie on somebody on a factual, not opinion, issue. "Franken grabbed my tiddies without permission" is either objectively true or false. If false, was it made with knowledge of the falsity? That's different that "Franken is a shithead." Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Now, the failure to administer the law about making materially false factual statements correctly is not the law's fault, e.g., the Texas fuckstick's domestic violence rap going unreported.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Lmao you really are an asshat.

[nmoore63]

It's pretty obvious we need a process to deal with this. Average Men have had to deal with this type of Witch Hunt as Doc says for probably the last 2 decades. Now, the movers and shakers are getting there dose of medicine from the world they created. I say welcome to the party.

The first standard we need to get in place before we take these accusations seriously is the Accuser needs to make a formal Sworn Statement under penalty of Purgy and file the accusation with a court. If they are not willing to do that, they should be viewed with suspicion.

Except in many cases the courts will not hold them accountable when it is proven they lied. It's changed a little, but we are still talking about women getting walking away with probation at most.

Zing! It's *already* agin the law to lie on somebody on a factual, not opinion, issue. "Franken grabbed my tiddies without permission" is either objectively true or false. If false, was it made with knowledge of the falsity? That's different that "Franken is a shithead." Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Now, the failure to administer the law about making materially false factual statements correctly is not the law's fault, e.g., the Texas fuckstick's domestic violence rap going unreported.

The issue being that for most of these, its going to be just as impossible to prove false as it is to prove true....