Trump's SCOTUS

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sat Apr 08, 2017 10:02 am

It was the plantation owner's right to take the slave's life as well. He was also the first to cry about his "liberty" when people recognized the human rights of his alleged property.

You are not so different.

PartyOf5
Posts: 3657
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by PartyOf5 » Sat Apr 08, 2017 10:05 am

C-Mag wrote: It would be a very, very, tough fight. There would be blood in the streets.
Considering the topic, that's gross. :shifty:

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18586
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Martin Hash » Sat Apr 08, 2017 10:14 am

There are other options:

Make women take birth control until given permission by The State to have children.

Take fetuses from the womb early & raise them in incubators.

Keep the mother anesthetized for the duration of the pregnancy.

There are others but we never discuss them, why is that?
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28231
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by C-Mag » Sat Apr 08, 2017 10:16 am

Martin Hash wrote:Did you just imply that Blacks don't want abortions?
No, I am stating historical facts that Progressives targeted Black Communities with a far higher concentration of abortion clinics than white communities. Progs did this because they felt that Blacks would not likely become productive members of society and therefore for the betterment of the collective their reproductions rate should be limited.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18586
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Martin Hash » Sat Apr 08, 2017 10:17 am

The don't build new roads because people will use them argument.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28231
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by C-Mag » Sat Apr 08, 2017 10:18 am

PartyOf5 wrote:
C-Mag wrote: It would be a very, very, tough fight. There would be blood in the streets.
Considering the topic, that's gross. :shifty:
:? Abortion is a gross topic guy.

I can and will post a whole bunch of pics of chopped up babies if you like. Some topics should not be sterilized.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Fife » Sat Apr 08, 2017 10:37 am

Martin Hash wrote:There are other options:

Make women take birth control until given permission by The State to have children.

Take fetuses from the womb early & raise them in incubators.

Keep the mother anesthetized for the duration of the pregnancy.

There are others but we never discuss them, why is that?
What are your "other options" as alternatives to state euthanasia for IRL disabled "people?"

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18586
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Martin Hash » Sat Apr 08, 2017 10:40 am

Fife wrote:
Martin Hash wrote:There are other options:

Make women take birth control until given permission by The State to have children.

Take fetuses from the womb early & raise them in incubators.

Keep the mother anesthetized for the duration of the pregnancy.

There are others but we never discuss them, why is that?
What are your "other options" as alternatives to state euthanasia for IRL disabled "people?"
Warehousing, like we do now.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
clubgop
Posts: 7978
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by clubgop » Sat Apr 08, 2017 8:21 pm

Okeefenokee wrote:
Kath wrote:
clubgop wrote: They did it to us so we do it to them.
And pretty soon they'll change the rules so two guys in the john can make law.

There's no US and THEM..... all these clowns forget the other team will be in power in the not-too-distant future and play tit-for-tat. Congress is filled with 3rd graders. These are not thoughtful people. They are every bit as short sighted as their corporate masters.
Two hundred years of policy, interrupted by nine years of a rule enacted by democrats, and a return to the policy of the past two centuries, and we can be sure that fake news consuming shitlibs will eat up hook line and sinker that a return to two centuries of procedure is in some way a deviation from the norm.

Make sure you make some more posts in support of military intervention.
This is Kath for you. Never complains or calls the Democrats children when they do it. But let the republicans act like they actually won the elections and suddenly everybody is a child and we are spewing MSM talking points talking about the end of the country.

Okeefenokee
Posts: 12950
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
Location: The Great Place

Re: Trump's SCOTUS

Post by Okeefenokee » Sat Apr 08, 2017 8:30 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Kath wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:Well the good news is that we are one step closer to letting states decide whether they want to criminalize abortion or not.
I'm sure your loins are tingly at the thought of all those women dying from back alley abortions.

Well, there's the "reasoned discourse" you are so famous for.
Won't someone think of the children? Like in Syria. So glad to see Trump acting presidential and attacking a country on the other side of the world. It's not like the victims of another war will leave behind orphans. There's no children to think of in war.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.

viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751