Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
It was the plantation owner's right to take the slave's life as well. He was also the first to cry about his "liberty" when people recognized the human rights of his alleged property.
You are not so different.
You are not so different.
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Considering the topic, that's gross.C-Mag wrote: It would be a very, very, tough fight. There would be blood in the streets.
-
- Posts: 18737
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
There are other options:
Make women take birth control until given permission by The State to have children.
Take fetuses from the womb early & raise them in incubators.
Keep the mother anesthetized for the duration of the pregnancy.
There are others but we never discuss them, why is that?
Make women take birth control until given permission by The State to have children.
Take fetuses from the womb early & raise them in incubators.
Keep the mother anesthetized for the duration of the pregnancy.
There are others but we never discuss them, why is that?
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
No, I am stating historical facts that Progressives targeted Black Communities with a far higher concentration of abortion clinics than white communities. Progs did this because they felt that Blacks would not likely become productive members of society and therefore for the betterment of the collective their reproductions rate should be limited.Martin Hash wrote:Did you just imply that Blacks don't want abortions?
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 18737
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
The don't build new roads because people will use them argument.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Abortion is a gross topic guy.PartyOf5 wrote:Considering the topic, that's gross.C-Mag wrote: It would be a very, very, tough fight. There would be blood in the streets.
I can and will post a whole bunch of pics of chopped up babies if you like. Some topics should not be sterilized.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
What are your "other options" as alternatives to state euthanasia for IRL disabled "people?"Martin Hash wrote:There are other options:
Make women take birth control until given permission by The State to have children.
Take fetuses from the womb early & raise them in incubators.
Keep the mother anesthetized for the duration of the pregnancy.
There are others but we never discuss them, why is that?
-
- Posts: 18737
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Warehousing, like we do now.Fife wrote:What are your "other options" as alternatives to state euthanasia for IRL disabled "people?"Martin Hash wrote:There are other options:
Make women take birth control until given permission by The State to have children.
Take fetuses from the womb early & raise them in incubators.
Keep the mother anesthetized for the duration of the pregnancy.
There are others but we never discuss them, why is that?
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
This is Kath for you. Never complains or calls the Democrats children when they do it. But let the republicans act like they actually won the elections and suddenly everybody is a child and we are spewing MSM talking points talking about the end of the country.Okeefenokee wrote:Two hundred years of policy, interrupted by nine years of a rule enacted by democrats, and a return to the policy of the past two centuries, and we can be sure that fake news consuming shitlibs will eat up hook line and sinker that a return to two centuries of procedure is in some way a deviation from the norm.Kath wrote:And pretty soon they'll change the rules so two guys in the john can make law.clubgop wrote: They did it to us so we do it to them.
There's no US and THEM..... all these clowns forget the other team will be in power in the not-too-distant future and play tit-for-tat. Congress is filled with 3rd graders. These are not thoughtful people. They are every bit as short sighted as their corporate masters.
Make sure you make some more posts in support of military intervention.
-
- Posts: 12950
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:27 pm
- Location: The Great Place
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Won't someone think of the children? Like in Syria. So glad to see Trump acting presidential and attacking a country on the other side of the world. It's not like the victims of another war will leave behind orphans. There's no children to think of in war.Speaker to Animals wrote:Kath wrote:I'm sure your loins are tingly at the thought of all those women dying from back alley abortions.Speaker to Animals wrote:Well the good news is that we are one step closer to letting states decide whether they want to criminalize abortion or not.
Well, there's the "reasoned discourse" you are so famous for.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
viewtopic.php?p=60751#p60751