The Tweet is Undefendable

[DBTrek]

The internet already affected the last election. Like a lot

You are awarded one cookie.

GCF was talking about millennials on the internet.
Feel free to review the average millennial tumblr feed or FB page and explain to me what a massive impact they're having on elections with their non-stop sour grapes.
They just lost 4 in a row.

[Ex-California]

The internet already affected the last election. Like a lot

You are awarded one cookie.

GCF was talking about millennials on the internet.
Feel free to review the average millennial tumblr feed or FB page and explain to me what a massive impact they're having on elections with their non-stop sour grapes.
They just lost 4 in a row.

There is a massive impact in that their retarded beliefs are causing people who wouldn't care one way or another to ensure to oppose nearly everything that they constantly screed about.

Its like the Silent Majority all over again

[DBTrek]

Except it's not a popular majority.
It's en electoral majority.

So I think we could probably credit a wise electoral college strategy over social-media complainers becoming more intolerable, eh?
I mean, Occam's Razor and all that.

[clubgop]

Another nice philosophical point completely undermined by a hack trying to assign that behavior to a single group that he doesn't like.

That's the point.
It's the behavior that's condemnable.
Go google "psychology of doxxing" and you'll see article after article wailing about SJWs.

Today though, doxxing is apparently the new weapon of freedom fighters and online heroes - because CNN.
Such is the flexibility of some folks personal morality.

It's about the power imbalance. I am ok with a million dollar, graduate school member of the press with access to millions of viewers being held to the same account that they do to anonymous common people with limited resources. SJW's doing it to a truck driver or some computer programmer is wrong because of the target.

[clubgop]

Except it's not a popular majority.
It's en electoral majority.

So I think we could probably credit a wise electoral college strategy over social-media complainers becoming more intolerable, eh?
I mean, Occam's Razor and all that.

Well the House vote was 3 million more plus to the republicans. So remove the personalities of Trump and Hillary and you get a better picture of the generic.

[DBTrek]

It's about the power imbalance. I am ok with a million dollar, graduate school member of the press with access to millions of viewers being held to the same account that they do to anonymous common people with limited resources. SJW's doing it to a truck driver or some computer programmer is wrong because of the target.

I think it's one of those things that's just wrong in general. Hiding behind anonymity while threatening and intimidating others is just a punk move, regardless of the targets relative power. It's like armed robbery - sure, a mugger might take $500 off Bill Gates in a dark alley and not hurt his net worth in any perceivable fashion. The same mugger might take all the grocery money a single parent has for a month. Obviously the single parent is hit harder than Bill Gates, but that doesn't make armed robbery "ok".

Same with this. CNN is threatened to doxx this poor schmuck who talked mad shit on the internet. In return, you got the kooks and low testy clowns on this forum spazzing out and posting photos of reporter's homes, their spouses info, their phone numbers, etc, etc, because they're just as evil as the jerks at CNN. Both sides want to claim the moral high ground, and both sides are moral failures.

[TheReal_ND]

Welp. Pack it in boys. HAS doxed himself through his posts and since his FB account wasn't locked down it took all of five minutes for k street to find him. His name is going to be public knowledge in a couple days. He's got a history of making racist posts and they are going to tie it to Trump.

Lol his FB still isn't locked down. I'm looking at it now.

[TheReal_ND]

Heh he posted this

[clubgop]

It's about the power imbalance. I am ok with a million dollar, graduate school member of the press with access to millions of viewers being held to the same account that they do to anonymous common people with limited resources. SJW's doing it to a truck driver or some computer programmer is wrong because of the target.

I think it's one of those things that's just wrong in general. Hiding behind anonymity while threatening and intimidating others is just a punk move, regardless of the targets relative power. It's like armed robbery - sure, a mugger might take $500 off Bill Gates in a dark alley and not hurt his net worth in any perceivable fashion. The same mugger might take all the grocery money a single parent has for a month. Obviously the single parent is hit harder than Bill Gates, but that doesn't make armed robbery "ok".

Same with this. CNN is threatened to doxx this poor schmuck who talked mad shit on the internet. In return, you got the kooks and low testy clowns on this forum spazzing out and posting photos of reporter's homes, their spouses info, their phone numbers, etc, etc, because they're just as evil as the jerks at CNN. Both sides want to claim the moral high ground, and both sides are moral failures.

Nah, to me the analogy is more like Bill Gates mugging people for their shit and a community coming together to take back what Bill Gates the mugger stole. Fuck the highground this is the playground and you play by those rules.

[Ex-California]

The perception of power imbalance is also why people are saying that Trump's critical tweets of the Press are somehow chilling the 1A