Barack Obama's Legacy -- How strong of a President is he historically?

nmoore63
Posts: 1881
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:10 pm

Re: Barack Obama's Legacy -- How strong of a President is he historically?

Post by nmoore63 » Sun Dec 02, 2018 10:42 am

You understand you are making the “right to bear arms means muskets” argument, right?

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Barack Obama's Legacy -- How strong of a President is he historically?

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sun Dec 02, 2018 10:46 am

LMFAO

No, genius. I am demolishing your magic soil argument with the truth. There was no such thing in the minds of the framers. They included the natural born citizen clause, a term with a specific history and meaning in common law, because they did not want presidents with dual allegiances.

You cannot legitimately alter the Constitution by redefining terms. Get outta here with that living document shit.

nmoore63
Posts: 1881
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:10 pm

Re: Barack Obama's Legacy -- How strong of a President is he historically?

Post by nmoore63 » Sun Dec 02, 2018 11:09 am

Guess he doesn’t.

Well you can only lead a horse to water and all that.

Any of you kids at home still confused, let me know.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Barack Obama's Legacy -- How strong of a President is he historically?

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sun Dec 02, 2018 11:13 am

You know better than this. You are deliberately playing games because you know I am factually correct and you have no good argument.

But I will play this silly game too. *If* the 2nd amendment said "the right of the people to keep and bear muskets shall not be infringed", only then would you have a point, and I would be correct even there in stating you need to amend the Constitution if you want it to mean arms.

But it did not say muskets. It uses the general term for arms. I am consistently reading the document as it was intended by the authors rather than reinterpreting it and redefining words to get the outcome I want, like some purple-haired post-modernist gay dance professor

You still have problems apparently reading that text as it was intended.

nmoore63
Posts: 1881
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:10 pm

Re: Barack Obama's Legacy -- How strong of a President is he historically?

Post by nmoore63 » Sun Dec 02, 2018 11:33 am

Exactly why the constitution doesn’t say coverture.

It does not and purposefully didn’t define what makes one a citizen at birth.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Barack Obama's Legacy -- How strong of a President is he historically?

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sun Dec 02, 2018 11:37 am

No. It says natural born citizen, which had a specific meaning in common law and coverture.

LMFAO you are desperate.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: Barack Obama's Legacy -- How strong of a President is he historically?

Post by Speaker to Animals » Sun Dec 02, 2018 11:38 am

I can play your game too. Redefine citizen to mean everybody except Nick Moore. No amendment necessary.. LOL

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25131
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Barack Obama's Legacy -- How strong of a President is he historically?

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Sun Dec 02, 2018 12:14 pm

Wow what a shitshow.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

nmoore63
Posts: 1881
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2017 2:10 pm

Re: Barack Obama's Legacy -- How strong of a President is he historically?

Post by nmoore63 » Sun Dec 02, 2018 12:52 pm

Speaker to Animals wrote:
Sun Dec 02, 2018 11:37 am
No. It says natural born citizen, which had a specific meaning in common law and coverture.

LMFAO you are desperate.
Sad.

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28128
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Barack Obama's Legacy -- How strong of a President is he historically?

Post by C-Mag » Sun Dec 02, 2018 12:57 pm

nmoore63 wrote:
Sun Dec 02, 2018 10:42 am
You understand you are making the “right to bear arms means muskets” argument, right?
I want a musket....... Pennsylvania Long Rifle Specifically .
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience