Goddamn, Fife.Fife wrote:Yeah, those fake ass motherfuckers should take a knee at prayer time.
THE ERA OF TRUMP
-
- Posts: 811
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:33 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Martin Hash wrote:Liberty allows people to get their jollies any way they want. Just don't expect to masturbate with my lotion.
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
What is she thinking?
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
My balls need some air?TheReal_ND wrote:What is she thinking?
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
TheReal_ND wrote:
What is she thinking?
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Why is he so silly?
-
- Posts: 677
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 7:29 pm
- Location: NY
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
You haven't done shit besides point at a single phrase I made and scream RRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!Smitty-48 wrote:I've got a firm grip on your disingenous concern trolling undercover bitch hackery, and I'm merely pointing it out, if you are want to undermine your credibility as a good faith poster, that's on you, I'm not undermining you by pointing out your bad faith posts made under the disingenous rubric of "just wanting to have a good faith discussion", you're doing that to yourself.adwinistrator wrote:
Here we go... Ready? All of your complaints about what I wrote could have been resolved with the simple statement "I don't think tariffs are anti-capitalist". In fact, I probably would have agree'd with you, that I should have said "protectionist" instead, but that would have been a civil conversation about the terminology I was using, but we can't have that! No, we have to start calling someone disingenuous and insult their intelligence.
Seriously, get a grip.
Seriously, stop whining and just get on with it.
I was agreeing with Capps that it's a negotiating tactic, but because I used the wrong words, I am disingenuous?
According to you, a difference in terminology is bad-faith trolling. Seriously?
I don't understand what your point is?
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
What did they mean by this?
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
Now you're just trying to deflect because I have simply pointed out your bad faith concern trolling. /shrugsadwinistrator wrote:
You haven't done shit besides point at a single phrase I made and scream RRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
I was agreeing with Capps that it's a negotiating tactic, but because I used the wrong words, I am disingenuous?
According to you, a difference in terminology is bad-faith trolling. Seriously?
I don't understand what your point is?
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 1566
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:33 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
pfffftttFife wrote:My balls need some air?TheReal_ND wrote:What is she thinking?
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: THE ERA OF TRUMP
I want an honest answer: you wearing your camo MAGA hat right now?TheReal_ND wrote:What did they mean by this?