-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25279
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Fri Jun 02, 2017 10:05 am
BjornP wrote:GCF wrote:I'm surprised that anyone is "against" male circumcision, honestly. There's no real effect on the penis, that I'm aware of, other than lower infection rates etc.
Virtually no Danish male who isn't either Jewish or Muslim, is circumcised. With the invention of antibiotics and better education about daily hygiene, there's no significant medicial benefit to it. And while the opposition here isn't Men's Rights Activism-related, the arguments are the same: That it is morally on par with FGM, that it is mutilation. Personally, I think the practise is bizarre, and has no rational place outside religion, but I don't believe in banning it, and while there is no
significant medical benefit to males (or rather, males who are raised to wash themselves and whose parents can afford antibiotics), a medicial benefit is there and the downsides (less sensitivity in the glans of the penis due to the hardening of the skin there) are minor.
And, it creates a little extra cash for the North American medical profession.
So, the choice then, is to pay for a (very cheap) procedure at birth, or pay for a lifetime of antibiotics to prevent a perpetual infection?
I have 2 sons on the way next month, and I know what I'll choose...
Also, given that I do think we're headed for a global economic meltdown in my life, what happens when you can't get antibiotics? Or the germs simply grow immune?
-
TheReal_ND
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Post
by TheReal_ND » Fri Jun 02, 2017 10:06 am
FONT TOUCH HIS WEINER YOU FUCKING DEGENERATE
-
BjornP
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Post
by BjornP » Fri Jun 02, 2017 10:17 am
Speaker to Animals wrote:
Yeah, mine is missing as well. So I can only guess at what I am missing, though I am pretty sure I would not miss the stink.
This is like watching that old 80's movie about the coca-cola bottle that landed on some African native's head, and they treat it as if a piece of heaven fell down ( or some similar plot).
You realize soap and water has been around for like, millenias, right? Sure, it will start to smell.... if you don't wash it for a day or two. So would your armpits. You
are aware that foreskin retracts, right?
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25279
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Fri Jun 02, 2017 10:21 am
BjornP wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:
Yeah, mine is missing as well. So I can only guess at what I am missing, though I am pretty sure I would not miss the stink.
This is like watching that old 80's movie about the coca-cola bottle that landed on some African native's head, and they treat it as if a piece of heaven fell down ( or some similar plot).
You realize soap and water has been around for like, millenias, right? Sure, it will start to smell.... if you don't wash it for a day or two. So would your armpits. You
are aware that foreskin retracts, right?
The Gods Must Be Crazy. There were 2 of them, and they were my favorite movies as a little kid.
Yeah, but it's a disease vector that serves no purpose - similar to the appendix. I'm still not hearing a counter-argument to circumcision...
-
TheReal_ND
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Post
by TheReal_ND » Fri Jun 02, 2017 10:22 am
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Fri Jun 02, 2017 10:23 am
BjornP wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:Implying marxists don't institute their own blasphemy laws. What is the criminalization of "hate speech" if not a blasphemy law?
The reason it isn't, is because the blasphemy was aimed at the religion, ie. the
beliefs themselves. Hate speech laws are aimed the
individuals who
practise those beliefs. While both run counter to the spirit of free speech, the subject of their defense is thus different.
I disagree. These laws are totally aimed at belief, i.e. the belief that the Holocaust never happened or the belief that a large percentage of Muslims will never successfully integrate into western civilization are the targets of those laws. The impetus very much is a religion. Marxism is religious in its nature, and the people who practice the neo-marxism we see today very much act like religious fanatics in all things.
The belief in
diversity == good and
tolerance == highest virtue belie a religious value system. The neo-marxists have blind faith in their marxist ideologies and they will get violent with anybody who speaks heresy within that ideology.
To claim that women are not as good as men at some jobs is literally a heresy in the marxist religion. They can get violent when you express that heresy.
It's a religion and these laws that they pass are no different than heresy and blasphemy laws.
-
heydaralon
- Posts: 7571
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm
Post
by heydaralon » Fri Jun 02, 2017 10:23 am
Yeah who wants to have a bunch of dick cheese? I like rocking the mushroom. Foreskins also increase chance of STDS.
Shikata ga nai
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Fri Jun 02, 2017 10:25 am
GrumpyCatFace wrote:BjornP wrote:GCF wrote:I'm surprised that anyone is "against" male circumcision, honestly. There's no real effect on the penis, that I'm aware of, other than lower infection rates etc.
Virtually no Danish male who isn't either Jewish or Muslim, is circumcised. With the invention of antibiotics and better education about daily hygiene, there's no significant medicial benefit to it. And while the opposition here isn't Men's Rights Activism-related, the arguments are the same: That it is morally on par with FGM, that it is mutilation. Personally, I think the practise is bizarre, and has no rational place outside religion, but I don't believe in banning it, and while there is no
significant medical benefit to males (or rather, males who are raised to wash themselves and whose parents can afford antibiotics), a medicial benefit is there and the downsides (less sensitivity in the glans of the penis due to the hardening of the skin there) are minor.
And, it creates a little extra cash for the North American medical profession.
So, the choice then, is to pay for a (very cheap) procedure at birth, or pay for a lifetime of antibiotics to prevent a perpetual infection?
I have 2 sons on the way next month, and I know what I'll choose...
Also, given that I do think we're headed for a global economic meltdown in my life, what happens when you can't get antibiotics? Or the germs simply grow immune?
You took his claim at face value. Mistake.
http://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedu ... c-20013585
There exist significant medical benefits to it.
-
BjornP
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Post
by BjornP » Fri Jun 02, 2017 10:26 am
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
So, the choice then, is to pay for a (very cheap) procedure at birth, or pay for a lifetime of antibiotics to prevent a perpetual infection?
I have 2 sons on the way next month, and I know what I'll choose...
Also, given that I do think we're headed for a global economic meltdown in my life, what happens when you can't get antibiotics? Or the germs simply grow immune?
Lol, a "lifetime of antibiotics"? Seriously. It's not like all of Europe, Latin America and Asian men have to go to the doctor every week, or even every month or every year to get their regular dick shots against urinary tract infection.
I think I had a UTI when I was 6 yo. Hadn't had one since then. Comes with having hot, running water and soap.
If we run out of antibiotics AND running water AND the ability to make soap.... then we'll probably be looking at more daily worries than just the occasional dick itch. Several thousands year's worth of Europeans somehow made do without adopting that particular Middle Eastern practise and somehow that turned out quite well. And that was even before the invention of modern medicine and improvements in personal hygiene standards.
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
-
Speaker to Animals
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Post
by Speaker to Animals » Fri Jun 02, 2017 10:27 am
heydaralon wrote:Yeah who wants to have a bunch of dick cheese? I like rocking the mushroom. Foreskins also increase chance of STDS.
Huge decrease in the chances of a heterosexual man contracting HIV comes with circumcision. As in 50-60% less likely to contract HIV from an infected woman..
http://www.catie.ca/en/fact-sheets/prev ... -infection
Oh, and no dick cheese..