President for Life

[Viktorthepirate]

It's not flawed on any level. It measures general intelligence quite effectively.

Wow just.... wow.

Ok, we'll go with that.

[Speaker to Animals]

Average IQ heat map by country.




GDP per capita:

[Speaker to Animals]

It's not flawed on any level. It measures general intelligence quite effectively.

Wow just.... wow.

Ok, we'll go with that.

Cool argument, bro.

[Viktorthepirate]

Average IQ heat map by country.




GDP per capita:

I'm done, you're making causal arguments but ignoring any contrary evidence because it doesn't fit your narrative. Not countering, just ignoring.

Ice cream sales increase in Australia in July, and so do shark attacks... therefore ice cream causes shark attacks!

I can't figure out if you're a simpleton masquerading as a pseudo-intellectual or just a very sad and unhappy person who needs to grasp for perceived superiority in any form to feel better than someone, anyone.

Anyways, I'm bored of bringing up facts and being told either "nah" with no further comment or being accused of the same illogical behavior you partake in.

[Speaker to Animals]

Average IQ heat map by country.




GDP per capita:

I'm done, you're making causal arguments but ignoring any contrary evidence because it doesn't fit your narrative. Not countering, just ignoring.

Ice cream sales increase in Australia in July, and so do shark attacks... therefore ice cream causes shark attacks!

I can't figure out if you're a simpleton masquerading as a pseudo-intellectual or just a very sad and unhappy person who needs to grasp for perceived superiority in any form to feel better than someone, anyone.

Anyways, I'm bored of bringing up facts and being told either "nah" with no further comment or being accused of the same illogical behavior you partake in.

What contrary evidence

Economic and technological development is literally directly related to average IQ. That's not some hypothetical assertion.

[Speaker to Animals]

Even within our own country, distributions broken down by average IQ correlate to different economic development of those groups.

If you have a demographic inside of America with an average IQ of 85, and the average IQ of another demographic is closer to 100, would you expect equal success in careers between those two groups?? When most people in group A are clustered around an IQ of 85, and most of the high-paying jobs require an IQ over 100, how exactly do you imagine that plays out economically?

[Speaker to Animals]

Here's something for you SJWs to ponder..

The average IQ of Fortune 500 CEOs is 124. https://brainsize.wordpress.com/2014/07 ... -500-ceos/

39% of them have IQ's over 140 (genius).

We always hear from the left how this or that racial demographic isn't represented in the top leadership roles in business. Here are the distributions:



Given those distributions and the average IQ of the men who serve in those roles, can you maybe just perhaps see a tiny little problem with the assertion that some demographics should have "equal representation" there?

[floam412]

Guns, Germs, and Steel is considered a joke publication by most of us. It's the liberal's way of dismissing plain facts, and it's not even internally consistent.

Like all this other shit, it's just people obsessing over the fact that intelligence matters, that races are different, etc. They just don't want to accept it, so they concoct ridiculous excuses and elaborate theories to explain it away.

Ok, forgive me but let me get this correct... but what do you mean by "plain facts"? Are you talking about the already rejected theory of races having differing craniums which promotes larger brains and allows different intelligences? The thing that I find so hilarious about true fringed alt-righters is that groups of scientist/specialists, whatever, will come out with studies, theories, etc. that can show why we can reject old ways of thinking like what you're describing and can say that they are just following some "liberal agenda" And I'll be completely honest... I don't know everything myself and would need to look a few things up myself to find what I need to debate you with, but they would be through peer reviewed articles. Do you find yourself more capable/competent than these "liberal" scientists, professors, etc? Honestly, I find it intriguing because I never have the stamina nor the amount of ibuprofen to debate someone like yourself.

Everyone is out against you, or "most of you" and your beliefs A.K.A "plain facts"... we get it.

[Speaker to Animals]

Example: he attempts to dismiss racial differences, specifically IQ differences, as a factor through a bizarre geographical theory in which landmass A residents (old world) could benefit from trade because they all shared similar latitudes with many other peoples spanning east and west, but the residents of landmass B were stunted due to the fact that they spanned longitudinally. But welhen we arrived here, evidence was overwhelming that domesticated plants were traded all across the landmass (e.g. maize). Geography did not hinder them in trade at all.

In fact we know of a great deal of cultural and technological exchange between the northern coast people in South America and the western coast peoples of Mesoamerica, as well as the Mayans down in the Peten rainforest. For example, there was no intermediate stages in ceramic culture in Mesoamerica. Suddenly the Mayans were making sophisticated ceramics, not unlike those found among the Andean peoples. Metalworking arrived late in the western coast civilizations of Mesoamerica via trade with the northern coast people (possibly Chimu or Sipan). There was an entire civilization in Mesoamerica that spoke a dialect of Quechua. I think there is still a population of those people. Western coast peoples also mummified remains in a similar fashion as South Americans.

Maize was domesticated in Mesoamerica, but by the time we arrived, people were farming the Mayan three sisters method deep into modern-day Canada. Likewise, the Spanish discovered even the Inca growing maize in the same method.

There was LOTS of trade in the Americas. He was totally wrong!

[Speaker to Animals]

Another one...

Germs went both ways. Conquistadors were dropping like flies to indigenous diseases, possibly more so than the indigenous were from old war diseases like smallpox.

Furthermore, we now know that the really big plague that killed off most of the Mexica, was not smallpox at all, but some unknown indigenous disease.

Disease, in particular, was a two-way street. This idea that Europeans were disease-ridden and new world people were pure as the driven snow is quite farcical.