President for Life

[Speaker to Animals]

Statistically, only about 5-10% of us, and that is mostly men, are even capable of putting out quality theories. Of those, about 1% are capable of the ground-breaking ideas. Those are exclusively men. You can break it down by race too. Top of the stack are the Jews, followed by East Asians, and then whites.

There seems to be another factor that drives innovation in addition to IQ, which is why whites and Jews innovate so highly, but Asians not so much, even though they have a better IQ resource.

[jediuser598]

Statistically, only about 5-10% of us, and that is mostly men, are even capable of putting out quality theories. Of those, about 1% are capable of the ground-breaking ideas. Those are exclusively men. You can break it down by race too. Top of the stack are the Jews, followed by East Asians, and then whites.

There seems to be another factor that drives innovation in addition to IQ, which is why whites and Jews innovate so highly, but Asians not so much, even though they have a better IQ resource.

Can you cite those?

[DrYouth]

[Can you cite those?

Why don't you read any books?

[Speaker to Animals]

Statistically, only about 5-10% of us, and that is mostly men, are even capable of putting out quality theories. Of those, about 1% are capable of the ground-breaking ideas. Those are exclusively men. You can break it down by race too. Top of the stack are the Jews, followed by East Asians, and then whites.

There seems to be another factor that drives innovation in addition to IQ, which is why whites and Jews innovate so highly, but Asians not so much, even though they have a better IQ resource.

Can you cite those?

Just look at the IQ distribution. I am out and on my phone now, but I am sure you can Google up a chart. As the distribution travels to the right (higher IQ), the population drops off logarithmically. By the time you get out past a certain IQ where people are actually able to conceive of radical new theories, at least 90% of the total population is to the left.

Now look for charts that show the IQ distributions of just women and men separated. They have the same mean, but females are more clustered around that mean than males. So going back out to whatever high IQ threshold you set, the line from the male distribution is higher than the female distribution. As you keep going out to genius territory, the female distribution falls to zero while the male distribution carries on just above zero for a while. Those guys are you Einsteins and Newtons. Females don't really go out that far.

The downside to this arrangement is a similar pattern on the other end of the spectrum. There are many more retarded men than retarded women.

If you look.at the distributions broken up by race, you will still see similar normal curves as before, but the means are shifted. The average IQ of black Africans is in the 60s. The average IQ of most whites is between 95 and 100. East Asians are something like 100-110. Jews are actually really high.

Hence Einstein -- a Jewish man. Indeed, Jewish men made most of the great discoveries in modern physics.

[Viktorthepirate]

Statistically, only about 5-10% of us, and that is mostly men, are even capable of putting out quality theories. Of those, about 1% are capable of the ground-breaking ideas. Those are exclusively men. You can break it down by race too. Top of the stack are the Jews, followed by East Asians, and then whites.

There seems to be another factor that drives innovation in addition to IQ, which is why whites and Jews innovate so highly, but Asians not so much, even though they have a better IQ resource.

Can you cite those?

Just look at the IQ distribution. I am out and on my phone now, but I am sure you can Google up a chart. As the distribution travels to the right (higher IQ), the population drops off logarithmically. By the time you get out past a certain IQ where people are actually able to conceive of radical new theories, at least 90% of the total population is to the left.

Now look for charts that show the IQ distributions of just women and men separated. They have the same mean, but females are more clustered around that mean than males. So going back out to whatever high IQ threshold you set, the line from the male distribution is higher than the female distribution. As you keep going out to genius territory, the female distribution falls to zero while the male distribution carries on just above zero for a while. Those guys are you Einsteins and Newtons. Females don't really go out that far.

The downside to this arrangement is a similar pattern on the other end of the spectrum. There are many more retarded men than retarded women.

If you look.at the distributions broken up by race, you will still see similar normal curves as before, but the means are shifted. The average IQ of black Africans is in the 60s. The average IQ of most whites is between 95 and 100. East Asians are something like 100-110. Jews are actually really high.

Hence Einstein -- a Jewish man. Indeed, Jewish men made most of the great discoveries in modern physics.

IQ tests are not everything.

http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2011/04/ ... ly-measure

[Speaker to Animals]

Average IQ of a nation directly correlates to its level of technological and economic development. It's the most important national resource.

[Viktorthepirate]

Average IQ of a nation directly correlates to its level of technological and economic development. It's the most important national resource.

All I'm saying is that the IQ test is flawed on multiple levels. And there are various academic studies that show that.

An example cited in the article (among others) is that IQ tests can improve up to 20 points when a monetary reward is offered.

Quit acting like its some irrefutable evidence of everything.

Study after study shows clearly that environmental factors influence the results.

[Speaker to Animals]

It's not flawed on any level. It measures general intelligence quite effectively.

[floam412]

Statistically, only about 5-10% of us, and that is mostly men, are even capable of putting out quality theories. Of those, about 1% are capable of the ground-breaking ideas. Those are exclusively men. You can break it down by race too. Top of the stack are the Jews, followed by East Asians, and then whites.

There seems to be another factor that drives innovation in addition to IQ, which is why whites and Jews innovate so highly, but Asians not so much, even though they have a better IQ resource.

Can you cite those?

Just look at the IQ distribution. I am out and on my phone now, but I am sure you can Google up a chart. As the distribution travels to the right (higher IQ), the population drops off logarithmically. By the time you get out past a certain IQ where people are actually able to conceive of radical new theories, at least 90% of the total population is to the left.

Now look for charts that show the IQ distributions of just women and men separated. They have the same mean, but females are more clustered around that mean than males. So going back out to whatever high IQ threshold you set, the line from the male distribution is higher than the female distribution. As you keep going out to genius territory, the female distribution falls to zero while the male distribution carries on just above zero for a while. Those guys are you Einsteins and Newtons. Females don't really go out that far.

The downside to this arrangement is a similar pattern on the other end of the spectrum. There are many more retarded men than retarded women.

If you look.at the distributions broken up by race, you will still see similar normal curves as before, but the means are shifted. The average IQ of black Africans is in the 60s. The average IQ of most whites is between 95 and 100. East Asians are something like 100-110. Jews are actually really high.

Hence Einstein -- a Jewish man. Indeed, Jewish men made most of the great discoveries in modern physics.

lol, are you kidding me? That's honestly all looking at stuff at face value and not thinking about the "why's" or the "how's".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guns,_Germs,_and_Steel

[Speaker to Animals]

Guns, Germs, and Steel is considered a joke publication by most of us. It's the liberal's way of dismissing plain facts, and it's not even internally consistent.

Like all this other shit, it's just people obsessing over the fact that intelligence matters, that races are different, etc. They just don't want to accept it, so they concoct ridiculous excuses and elaborate theories to explain it away.