Should Kath Be Allowed To Continue As Moderator?

[Montegriffo]

Shut it, Cricket boy. What happened to see you after the games?

I am weak and could not resist responding to your hypocrisy.

You make stupid cricket posts, don't throw stones when you live in a glass house, speaking of hypocrisy.

There you go with your self rightous judgements. You may find my cricket posts boring but they are no more stupid than your hockey spam.

[StCapps]

I am weak and could not resist responding to your hypocrisy.

You make stupid cricket posts, don't throw stones when you live in a glass house, speaking of hypocrisy.

There you go with your self rightous judgements. You may find my cricket posts boring but they are no more stupid than your hockey spam.

Nah your cricket talk is way more stupid because I actually have conversations about the sport of hockey with other people, you just talk to yourself.

[Montegriffo]

You make stupid cricket posts, don't throw stones when you live in a glass house, speaking of hypocrisy.

There you go with your self rightous judgements. You may find my cricket posts boring but they are no more stupid than your hockey spam.

Nah your cricket talk is way more stupid because I actually have conversations about the sport of hockey with other people, you just talk to yourself.

Not true, GCF gas expressed a wish to learn more about the beautiful game. Also upon the rare occasions Man with no name from Australia puts in an appearance we have had meaningful conversations about the Ashes.

[PartyOf5]

WTH. When I left this thread was 5 pages. Now it's 23, and from skimming through it's nothing but the 2 combatants (with some Monty thrown in) going back and forth. One of those combatants is posting pages of random shit. Oh, and that poster is the moderator.

[K@th]

As someone who is more of a reader than a poster, I'd say that hockey is probably one of the most egregious topics when it comes to derailing threads. It's due to the quantity of posts that will happen (trump one had just about 7 full pages of nothing but hockey talk once), how easy it seems to shoehorn it into a conversation (all it takes is one person making a sports analogy), and the fact that it's impossible to re-rail the discussion until Capps and Smitty go to bed. You can try to make a political post but it will be ignored and buried under an extra 2 pages of hockey.

Granted, there are several people that have their own triggers and moments where they would go off-topic whether to flame, meme, or have a topic about something unrelated. Those just don't really have the trifecta that happens with the hockey discussions. I wouldn't mind having some rule that softly enforces on-topic discussion. It can be sort of compared to a "is it porn or art?" situation where off-topic posts that stop after a bit or are somewhat related would be acceptable, but having to skip 100+ posts isn't. Some of the hockey discussions are practically threads within threads and that can get pretty ridiculous.

But having a soft-rule like that will 100% depend on whether you trust the moderator(s) to reasonably enforce the rule and I imagine that's not going to happen here.

Someone who gets it. Nice. That shit in the Trump thread was lame. They compare their walls of text over numerous pages in multiple threads as comparable to a couple of people going off topic for 3-4 posts.

Yeah, I'm not trusted, because I'm a loony-lefty SJW who wants all men to die. Plus, I edited 3-4 posts (in the past 15 months,) that specifically called someone a child fucker. That makes me the moderator from hell, but whatever.

But, yeah, pretty fucking annoying to start an Olympic thread, have it over run with pages upon pages of NHL shit within 3-4 posts, so we leave them to that thread, open a new one, and they spam that one too.

So, now we have two Canadian asshats who feel self-entitled to spam every fucking Olympics thread because NHL. Fuck them. They are here to do nothing but troll.

So, it's really up to Martin if he wants two asshole Canadians ruining his forum. This type of shit is why Dan shut down his forum; he didn't want his name associated with douchebags.

Jackholes, both of them.

[SuburbanFarmer]

[K@th]

Also.. and what the actual fuck? She edited clubgop's posts mocking Monty as a child molester but a few years ago she accused me of supporting child rape when I pointed out the young girl in the story she tried to use as some example, in fact, was a rape hoaxer.

This is democrat-level hypocrisy, people. Fucking hell.

Your premise was based on your belief that a 12-year old girl could consent to sex. Creepy.

[Speaker to Animals]

Also.. and what the actual fuck? She edited clubgop's posts mocking Monty as a child molester but a few years ago she accused me of supporting child rape when I pointed out the young girl in the story she tried to use as some example, in fact, was a rape hoaxer.

This is democrat-level hypocrisy, people. Fucking hell.

Your premise was based on your belief that a 12-year old girl could consent to sex. Creepy.

Uh.. no, princess. I pointed out that she had sex with other 12 year old boys and then made up a rape hoax to cover her ass (and was charged for it). Then you proceeded to label me a pedophile you fucking cunt. Now you are virtue signaling and censoring other posters for making JOKES about another poster being a pedo when you made the actual accusation against people for not supporting your extremist feminist view of the world.

FUCK YOU

You are the worst moderator ever. Nasty woman.

[Speaker to Animals]

I mean.. the fucking hypocrisy and gall of this bitch. She's sitting here censoring people for doing to her friends what she does to other people all the time. She's sitting here once again calling me a fucking pedophile for mentioning the facts of a case in the very thread where she is defending her censoring other posters for calling her fat beta friend a pedo.

What the actual fuck?

[StCapps]

So, it's really up to Martin if he wants two asshole Canadians ruining his forum. This type of shit is why Dan shut down his forum; he didn't want his name associated with douchebags.

Jackholes, both of them.

Martin Hash likes free speech, Dan Carlin, not so much. Plus Hash has "fuck you money", and Dan doesn't, so Dan needs to worry about his image a lot more or it could cost him money. That's what makes Hash cool, he doesn't give if we "ruin" his forum with hockey talk, or talk on any other subject for that matter, he welcomes it. You're just his butthurt moderator contemplating whether he should censor us or not, because you hate freedom of speech too.