No one's being forced to carry a baby. We're simply saying you can't kill the baby you created voluntarily.
You may not be aware of this, but people do get pregnant by accident.
And I even hear tell that it happens out of holy wedlock...
So if you voluntarily take an action which causes a person to come into your life that you didn't intend, and you don't want that person in your life, you can kill them.
Great philosophy cubicle gardener.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
Ok then.. You'd all be fine with overturning Roe v Wade, and just letting the states decide, and not bitching when most of them decide to leave abortion legal?
And you'd be totally fine with (let's say Texas) banning abortion, and watching a mass of women crossing into Oklahoma to have abortions. This wouldn't instantly turn into a campaign for "human rights" to ban abortion at the federal level.
We kinda already have that now. The number of doctors who can and will perform the procedure are dwindling, the malpractice insurance is really high, medical schools dont teach the procedures and an OB/GYN intern pretty much has to seek out the instruction, it is not part of the standard curriculum.
Just substitute abortion for guns read your statement again see how much sense it makes to you. If the gun grabbers who make similar complaints about the relaxed gun laws of neighboring states dont want a federal ban on guns why do you believe prolifers are any different?
If I don't like the outcome of the action I voluntarily take, I can just kill a person, right?
GrumpyCatFace wrote:Dumb slut partied too hard and woke up in a weird house. Ran out the door, weeping for her failed life choices, concerned townsfolk notes her appearance and alerted the fuzz.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Ok then.. You'd all be fine with overturning Roe v Wade, and just letting the states decide, and not bitching when most of them decide to leave abortion legal?
And you'd be totally fine with (let's say Texas) banning abortion, and watching a mass of women crossing into Oklahoma to have abortions. This wouldn't instantly turn into a campaign for "human rights" to ban abortion at the federal level.
Oklahoma would ban abortions. I think they already have low key
I don’t think so.
