Your liberty, well-being, nutrition, and everything else are dependent on your wealth. You'll have a hard time surviving as a hunter-gatherer in 2020, but I suppose it's possible. Whether you'd consider that a life worth living is up to you as well.Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 12:03 pmLiberty being dependent on "wealth" is a claim you are making with out justifying. Wealth is an incredibly abstract concept.SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 11:47 amNot anti-capitalist by any means. Anti crony-capitalist, and anti-monopolistic, certainly.Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 11:38 am
Give me one concrete example of how my liberty is threatened by Amazon before launching into your paranoid anti-capitalist conspiracies.
Your liberty is dependent on your wealth. Your wealth is taken by the government and distributed both directly to ConglomoMax (“subsidies”), and to an assortment of agencies who waste it, and use the rest to make sure that ConglomoMax isn’t threatened in any way by uppity plebs like yourself (“intellectual property”, “patent extension”, “licensing”, “Tax subsidy”, “preferred financing”, bailouts, etc).
Now go dig a better ditch around your hovel, lest the Master get crass and thump you.
In our crony-capitalist system I need very few resources to have maximum liberty. Resources that I can obtain with less and less work, and that stretch further and further every decade. To that extent, I currently have all the wealth I require for liberty, irrespective of Amazon's shareholder value. In fact, it is likely that Amazon's value helps me to maximize the value of my personal wealth.
Whatever ConglomoMax is doing with their tax subsidies is increasing my convenience, access to goods, and free time to enjoy them - so I wouldn't call them wasted. How have corporate bailouts negatively impacted my liberty?
So, again, how does Bezos' wealth in any way limit my liberty?
That wealth is indirectly funneled to ConglomoMax - ergo, your liberty is lessened by them.