Civil War Doomsday Clock

[C-Mag]

They would characterize Christians escaping persecution at the hands of homosexuals a case of Christians oppressing them.

The story of Sodom is their blueprint.

Just as the ancient Sodomites demanded Lot's children, these modern sodomites demand your children, and when you successfully preserve your children from that fate, they will call that "opprression".

As far as I can tell, Leftism today is about Free Sexual...………………. whatever. The freedom to have a dick or a fist shoved up ones ass, the freedom for a dude to dress up like a chick and go in the ladies toilet or locker room, the right for adults to have sex with children.

WTF happened to real civil rights on the Left !

In the strategy of opening up “rights” against an oppressive majority, you need to keep finding smaller and smaller groups to champion while conversely, the scope of the rights continues to expand. This is where that process has brought us.

That's understandable, but seemingly tossing out the Civil Rights of others doesn't make much sense and has damn little to do with Civil Liberties.

Where is the ACLU bringing law suits against big tech for deplatforming dissident voices? Against removing Confederate Statues? Against the federal government for the Bundy's, Hammonds or Tarp Man ?

Maybe I missed it, but it appears the ACLU is most interested making the US open to Non-Citizens getting the rights of US citizens and anal fisting.

[jediuser598]

Sure I suppose you can cherry pick history and completely ignore the liberal darling, ACLU, an organization that protected the civil rights of Nazis in Skokie, and who in Charlottesville, protected the alt-right's civil rights as well.

I cited the pre-eminent leftist regimes of the last century and drew parallels with the current leftist agenda we see being advanced in America.
You responded by selectively singling out two ACLU cases while completely avoiding Carlus' larger criticisms of the modern ACLU.

Who's really cherry picking here, boyo?
Seems pretty obvious.

So your defense is, "yeah, but you're doing it too!"

I contend that if you're against freedom of speech, you can't be liberal. If you contend that there are ideas or people you can't challenge with reason, then you can't be liberal.

Live and let live is a law argument as well as a cultural statement. A tolerance for diversity. Want to fuck guys? I don't care. Want to engage in religious worship, go ahead. Dye your hair purple or wear purple robes and go to your temple. I don't care if your normal is different than mine, or if your family takes a different shape than mine. You do you. Just because I don't like it, doesn't mean it's bad.

That guy overdosing on meth while tied up with a mask on is a proper representative of all liberals? That's the conservative portrayal of liberals, or is it the picture of marxists shooting tied up civilians? That's all liberals? Or are we all pedophiles? Us liberals?

[SuburbanFarmer]

How many of you believe that gay couples should be allowed to adopt?

The "right for sodomites to adopt" means the obligation to hand over Catholic babies to sodomites. Fuck yourself.

Abandoned babies would prefer to grow up in state care, lest their faith be trampled.

[Speaker to Animals]

How many of you believe that gay couples should be allowed to adopt?

The "right for sodomites to adopt" means the obligation to hand over Catholic babies to sodomites. Fuck yourself.

Abandoned babies would prefer to grow up in state care, lest their faith be trampled.

There are not as many babies to adopt as families who want to adopt.

[SuburbanFarmer]

The "right for sodomites to adopt" means the obligation to hand over Catholic babies to sodomites. Fuck yourself.

Abandoned babies would prefer to grow up in state care, lest their faith be trampled.

There are not as many babies to adopt as families who want to adopt.

Look at the actual process to adopt a child in this country. It’s absurd.

[DBTrek]

So your defense is, "yeah, but you're doing it too!"

No, Cathy Newman, there is no defense necessary when all I've offered is facts. Facts which you can neither address nor refute, hence your retreat into "So what you're saying . . . " followed by bullshit I never said.

Boring.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzz.

[jediuser598]

As far as I can tell, Leftism today is about Free Sexual...………………. whatever. The freedom to have a dick or a fist shoved up ones ass, the freedom for a dude to dress up like a chick and go in the ladies toilet or locker room, the right for adults to have sex with children.

WTF happened to real civil rights on the Left !

In the strategy of opening up “rights” against an oppressive majority, you need to keep finding smaller and smaller groups to champion while conversely, the scope of the rights continues to expand. This is where that process has brought us.

That's understandable, but seemingly tossing out the Civil Rights of others doesn't make much sense and has damn little to do with Civil Liberties.

Where is the ACLU bringing law suits against big tech for deplatforming dissident voices? Against removing Confederate Statues? Against the federal government for the Bundy's, Hammonds or Tarp Man ?

Maybe I missed it, but it appears the ACLU is most interested making the US open to Non-Citizens getting the rights of US citizens and anal fisting.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the ... f280a41ff8

[jediuser598]

So your defense is, "yeah, but you're doing it too!"

No, Cathy Newman, there is no defense necessary when all I've offered is facts. Facts which you can neither address nor refute, hence your retreat into "So what you're saying . . . " followed by bullshit I never said.

Boring.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzz.

You're the one that responded to me.

If I'm so boring, don't start arguments.

[DBTrek]

Stating facts isn't an argument.
Sorry it has you so discombobulated.
I'm sure you'll be able to recover in time.

[C-Mag]

I'm with Edgar Friendly