Nope. If she had such an overwhelming sense of responsibility she wouldn't have put off flying to DC to give her testimony. The more we find out about her the clearer the picture gets that this was all set up, and she is just playing her part.TheAmericanNomad wrote: ↑Fri Oct 05, 2018 5:45 pmIs it at all possible that she didn't want to report it when it happened but when she saw him about to get on the SCOTUS, she decided she had a responsibility to say something? Is that even a possibility in your mind?
Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Indellable in the hippocampus are the memories of all the fucking lies these sluts are willing to spew.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Senator Collins using Avenatti as a reason to vote for Kavanaugh is the best. Democrats could've lost and held the high ground, now they just lost. Suck it.
-
- Posts: 18667
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
A single Republican senator assassinated tonight would be enough to derail this. Of course, it’s being planned somewhere; I hope SS protection is on high for all of them. They could get the guy at his daughter’s wedding tomorrow.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Sounds crazy but that used to happen all the time.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
The van dweller does not speak for most of us, or most of anyone.TheReal_ND wrote: ↑Fri Oct 05, 2018 7:44 pmIf any woman reads my posts I want to firmly assure you I'm the only guy that has balls enough to post what the majority of us are thinking.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Sure thing White Knight cuck.DBTrek wrote: ↑Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:36 pmThe van dweller does not speak for most of us, or most of anyone.TheReal_ND wrote: ↑Fri Oct 05, 2018 7:44 pmIf any woman reads my posts I want to firmly assure you I'm the only guy that has balls enough to post what the majority of us are thinking.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Sure thing, Jean Clod Van Dweller.
Edgy A F.
Edgy A F.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
Where is your minion of followers to chirp in now? Oh how the mighty have fallen.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Trump's SCOTUS
If neither of us have “followers” chirping in, but only one of us claims to be speaking for almost everyone, my point is made.
/shrug
/shrug
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"