Insert one hundred billion eye rolls here.Smitty-48 wrote:The media is baised, but I don't doubt that CNN has sources with access to SIGINT, I'm sure those sources are biased as well, or they wouldn't be leaking, but I don't think they would fabricate the leak out of whole cloth, if they are leaking that they got Flynn dead to rights, then they got Flynn dead to rights.
Reagan threw away his first NSA pretty quick, they ain't always that central, Reagan had six of them over eight years, that's quite the quick burn rate. Not seeing the panic you are, maybe I will eventually, but so far, you are jumping the gun on media propaganda.Smitty-48 wrote:I don't buy that Flynn was not central to the team, Flynn was at the very top with total access to the President, one of the most trusted advisors, in the inner circle, clearly, you don't get to be National Security Advisor if you are just a throw away, if Trump had not suddenly demanded that Flynn fall on his sword, on the drop of a hat, I would not be smelling panic, but because they did, because they turned on Flynn so completely and so precipitously, after only three weeks, without putting up any sort of resistance, now I am smelling panic, that's a panicky thing to do, dictionary defintion of.
Assuming Trump's NSA is super central to his administration is not the slam dunk you think it is. Considering how quick Trump threw Flynn under the bus, it seems likely you were just wrong that Flynn was that important. Maybe you are just too attached to that assessment and it's leading you to misread this situation.