Not sure that a janitor would be part of the ‘federal judiciary’ that we were discussing, but thank you for your contribution, Donnie.clubgop wrote:Wow look at the goalpost moving here. At first we were defending the Ivy league elite but then 1 innocent question and now a janitor has to at least finish college.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Of course not. But if you can’t even finish college, then you shouldn’t be a federal anything.Hwen Hoshino wrote: We are gonna still pretend that school is the only source even now?
So far as actual knowledge, sure - it’s not necessary. But we need some kind of baseline here.
Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?
-
- Posts: 25283
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?
Nice try. Someone who doesn't finish college shouldn't be a federal anything. That was your quote that is what you said. Do you do any research before commenting in anything? Do you ever get anything right? Do you ever take personal responsibility? Are you ever honest? No, but thank you for your contribution, bitch.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Not sure that a janitor would be part of the ‘federal judiciary’ that we were discussing, but thank you for your contribution, Donnie.clubgop wrote:Wow look at the goalpost moving here. At first we were defending the Ivy league elite but then 1 innocent question and now a janitor has to at least finish college.GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Of course not. But if you can’t even finish college, then you shouldn’t be a federal anything.
So far as actual knowledge, sure - it’s not necessary. But we need some kind of baseline here.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?
Guess that rules out Abraham Lincoln.
-
- Posts: 25283
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?
clubgop wrote:Nice try. Someone who doesn't finish college shouldn't be a federal anything. That was your quote that is what you said. Do you do any research before commenting in anything? Do you ever get anything right? Do you ever take personal responsibility? Are you ever honest? No, but thank you for your contribution, bitch.GrumpyCatFace wrote:Not sure that a janitor would be part of the ‘federal judiciary’ that we were discussing, but thank you for your contribution, Donnie.clubgop wrote:
Wow look at the goalpost moving here. At first we were defending the Ivy league elite but then 1 innocent question and now a janitor has to at least finish college.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?
Undercover hack censorship bitch says what? Suck tha dick up till you hiccup.GrumpyCatFace wrote:AAB043E3-AEE8-4188-B7B8-3D40FFC18B2F.jpegclubgop wrote:Nice try. Someone who doesn't finish college shouldn't be a federal anything. That was your quote that is what you said. Do you do any research before commenting in anything? Do you ever get anything right? Do you ever take personal responsibility? Are you ever honest? No, but thank you for your contribution, bitch.GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Not sure that a janitor would be part of the ‘federal judiciary’ that we were discussing, but thank you for your contribution, Donnie.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?
Harry Truman.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?
Speaker to Animals wrote:Guess that rules out Abraham Lincoln.
GrumpyCatFace wrote: An Illinois hick gun nut that suspended habeas corpus good riddance.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?
Speaker to Animals wrote:Harry Truman.
GrumpyCatFace wrote:A Missourian hick no nothing that nuked the Japanese, good riddance.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?
clubgop wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:Guess that rules out Abraham Lincoln.GrumpyCatFace wrote: An Illinois hick gun nut that suspended habeas corpus good riddance.
Technically a broadsword nut.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Should the Federal Judiciary Be a "Co-Equal" Branch?
That to me sounded like good judgement too bad Mr. bench warrant= entrapment doesn't think so.Speaker to Animals wrote:clubgop wrote:Speaker to Animals wrote:Guess that rules out Abraham Lincoln.GrumpyCatFace wrote: An Illinois hick gun nut that suspended habeas corpus good riddance.
Technically a broadsword nut.