Merican Nazi: An Origin story

[Speaker to Animals]

It's definitely not a good idea to read something from the New Atlantic about the Alt-Right as if it is in any way truthful. New Atlantic is 100% lugenpresse. They are CNN in print (really, worse).

They are good to get an idea about how the globalists are trying to manipulate people, once you understand this fact, but perfectly worthless to understanding something like the Alt-Right. You really have to just listen to what the Alt-Right has to say to get an idea of what they are about.

[TheReal_ND]

Not sure if someone posted this article, but it's a pretty fascinating read, pretty epic too.

Also the first time I've read someone explicitly advocate the use of post-irony humor and signalling to widen the Overton window.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/ar ... zi/544119/

Luke is unhinged and a particularly bad example of journalism. Much of that article is made up whole cloth and he literally stalked Anglin's mom and left weird notes taped to her door.

Is that the response the Daily Stormer told you to make?

I haven't bothered reading the article but from what I've heard about it it's weird and pretty blatantly full of lies

You can listen to Anglin discuss it with the Death Panel in detail here. Because you know that is a right reserved in England. A rebuttal. Not that you would let a "nazi" have a rebuttal.

https://therightstuff.biz/2017/11/15/td ... ic-mohels/

[clubgop]

Not sure if someone posted this article, but it's a pretty fascinating read, pretty epic too.

Also the first time I've read someone explicitly advocate the use of post-irony humor and signalling to widen the Overton window.

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/ar ... zi/544119/

Luke is unhinged and a particularly bad example of journalism. Much of that article is made up whole cloth and he literally stalked Anglin's mom and left weird notes taped to her door.

Is that the response the Daily Stormer told you to make?

? Monty is giving a masterclass here.

[Montegriffo]

If the first ammendment is all about protecting the right to cyberstalk, intimidate, spread hateful racism and call upon hundreds of trolls to ruin the lives of others you can keep it. I have no problem with those abhorrent practices being against the law.

[Speaker to Animals]

If the first ammendment is all about protecting the right to cyberstalk, intimidate, spread hateful racism and call upon hundreds of trolls to ruin the lives of others you can keep it. I have no problem with those abhorrent practices being against the law.

That's what she tried to do to the Spencers, though. Why is it "heroic" when you guys do it, and "abhorrent" when they do it right back at you?

[Speaker to Animals]

The fact is, you leftist shit stains need to look in the mirror. As bad as the Alt-Right may be, they are nowhere nearly as racist and hateful as you.

[Montegriffo]

If the first ammendment is all about protecting the right to cyberstalk, intimidate, spread hateful racism and call upon hundreds of trolls to ruin the lives of others you can keep it. I have no problem with those abhorrent practices being against the law.

That's what she tried to do to the Spencers, though. Why is it "heroic" when you guys do it, and "abhorrent" when they do it right back at you?

Where have I supported mass trolling a person and ruining their lives?
Don't include me in ''you guys''.

[clubgop]

If the first ammendment is all about protecting the right to cyberstalk, intimidate, spread hateful racism and call upon hundreds of trolls to ruin the lives of others you can keep it. I have no problem with those abhorrent practices being against the law.

That is exactly what you advocate for the children of the people.

[Speaker to Animals]

If the first ammendment is all about protecting the right to cyberstalk, intimidate, spread hateful racism and call upon hundreds of trolls to ruin the lives of others you can keep it. I have no problem with those abhorrent practices being against the law.

That's what she tried to do to the Spencers, though. Why is it "heroic" when you guys do it, and "abhorrent" when they do it right back at you?

Where have I supported mass trolling a person and ruining their lives?
Don't include me in ''you guys''.

Oh, it's YOU GUYS because you are literally demonizing these people for trolling this woman right after she did the exact same fucking thing to Spencer's mother, and yet you cast her as some helpless victim. Don't fucking play coy.

[clubgop]

If the first ammendment is all about protecting the right to cyberstalk, intimidate, spread hateful racism and call upon hundreds of trolls to ruin the lives of others you can keep it. I have no problem with those abhorrent practices being against the law.

That's what she tried to do to the Spencers, though. Why is it "heroic" when you guys do it, and "abhorrent" when they do it right back at you?

Where have I supported mass trolling a person and ruining their lives?
Don't include me in ''you guys''.