Really, that's not what the post sounded like. It sounded like "Suck my balls, I'm rich, you aren't." I could be wrong, but I don't think my comprehension is that bad.Martin Hash wrote:Uhhhh... Dude? My point that ACHIEVEMENTS are what make someone special, they stay with you even after you die. Wealth is just luck, it can vanish at any time.The Conservative wrote:You realize your wealth is only digital... it can be taken away with a keyboard stroke and you'll be one of us again...Martin Hash wrote:Poor people discussing rich people is always so entertaining.
Grassley picking winners
-
- Posts: 14795
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Grassley picking winners
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Grassley picking winners
Don't you mean, buy my book? Gotta pay for the moat around your mansion to keep the raging mob out.Martin Hash wrote:Read my book.kybkh wrote:Suck it Marty.Martin Hash wrote:Poor people discussing rich people is always so entertaining.
The pitchforks are coming!!
-
- Posts: 14795
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Grassley picking winners
47.5%PartyOf5 wrote:There's a large percentage (was around 47%) that don't chip in anything.Zero wrote:Taxations premise to me has always been about allocating resources based on the needs of society with a goal for overall stability. Individuals can prosper, and chip in proportionally. It’s not losing when I’m promoting stability overall.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ ... story.html
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Grassley picking winners
You just wanted to hear Martin asking you to suck his balls.The Conservative wrote:Really, that's not what the post sounded like. It sounded like "Suck my balls, I'm rich, you aren't." I could be wrong, but I don't think my comprehension is that bad.Martin Hash wrote:Uhhhh... Dude? My point that ACHIEVEMENTS are what make someone special, they stay with you even after you die. Wealth is just luck, it can vanish at any time.The Conservative wrote:
You realize your wealth is only digital... it can be taken away with a keyboard stroke and you'll be one of us again...
-
- Posts: 18727
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Grassley picking winners
(We talked about this.)The Conservative wrote:Really, that's not what the post sounded like. It sounded like "Suck my balls, I'm rich, you aren't." I could be wrong, but I don't think my comprehension is that bad.Martin Hash wrote:Uhhhh... Dude? My point that ACHIEVEMENTS are what make someone special, they stay with you even after you die. Wealth is just luck, it can vanish at any time.The Conservative wrote:
You realize your wealth is only digital... it can be taken away with a keyboard stroke and you'll be one of us again...
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 18727
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Grassley picking winners
True but life ain't fair. (That's in my book.)PartyOf5 wrote:There's a large percentage (was around 47%) that don't chip in anything.Zero wrote:Taxations premise to me has always been about allocating resources based on the needs of society with a goal for overall stability. Individuals can prosper, and chip in proportionally. It’s not losing when I’m promoting stability overall.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 14795
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Grassley picking winners
Yes, we did, and I'm not attacking you... I am pointing out that wealth is not what it used to be, and what you said didn't sound like what you meant it to be.Martin Hash wrote:(We talked about this.)The Conservative wrote:Really, that's not what the post sounded like. It sounded like "Suck my balls, I'm rich, you aren't." I could be wrong, but I don't think my comprehension is that bad.Martin Hash wrote: Uhhhh... Dude? My point that ACHIEVEMENTS are what make someone special, they stay with you even after you die. Wealth is just luck, it can vanish at any time.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 3513
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 8:39 am
Re: Grassley picking winners
Remember when you couldn't find a job and were bitching about how little the government did for people in need? I remember. I'll bet others remember, too.The Conservative wrote:
Fiscal Responsibility has always been selfish to the left, except when they do it for themselves don't you know what?
Account abandoned.
-
- Posts: 18727
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Grassley picking winners
(Subtle trolling.)The Conservative wrote:Yes, we did, and I'm not attacking you... I am pointing out that wealth is not what it used to be, and what you said didn't sound like what you meant it to be.Martin Hash wrote:(We talked about this.)The Conservative wrote:
Really, that's not what the post sounded like. It sounded like "Suck my balls, I'm rich, you aren't." I could be wrong, but I don't think my comprehension is that bad.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Grassley picking winners
Yeah, he was the most liberal, socialist, "conservative" EVER back then. Constantly demanding to know why the system wouldn't do more for him. How quickly they forget . . .Kath wrote:Remember when you couldn't find a job and were bitching about how little the government did for people in need? I remember. I'll bet others remember, too.The Conservative wrote:
Fiscal Responsibility has always been selfish to the left, except when they do it for themselves don't you know what?
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"