DOJ Says Law Doesn’t Bar Transgender Discrimination

User avatar
de officiis
Posts: 2528
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:09 am

Re: DOJ Says Law Doesn’t Bar Transgender Discrimination

Post by de officiis » Fri Oct 06, 2017 12:42 pm

DBTrek wrote:Anorexics self-identify as 'fat', but they aren't.
In fact, indulging them in their obviously erroneous self-perception is harmful to them.
Seems like a reasonable call.

I'm not saying it's ok not to hire transgender people, or we should shun them from the workplace and force them into a life of poverty and desperation because they can't find employment. I'm saying I think it's reasonable not to force employers to buy into their self-identity or to force employers to accommodate their self-identity.
Agreed. And at least we are parting ways with the nitwittery that is going on in Canada right now, with people being forced by quasi-governmental organizations to pledge personal loyalty to the leftist groupthink just to make a living.
Image

User avatar
Martin Hash
Posts: 18727
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm

Re: DOJ Says Law Doesn’t Bar Transgender Discrimination

Post by Martin Hash » Fri Oct 06, 2017 12:48 pm

Bill Maher is a Translibertarian.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change

User avatar
Fife
Posts: 15157
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am

Re: DOJ Says Law Doesn’t Bar Transgender Discrimination

Post by Fife » Fri Oct 06, 2017 12:51 pm

Translibertine is more like it. That guy is a turd.

User avatar
Speaker to Animals
Posts: 38685
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm

Re: DOJ Says Law Doesn’t Bar Transgender Discrimination

Post by Speaker to Animals » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:13 pm

Bill Maher is a libertarian too. That should tell you all you need to know about libertarianism.

Ph64
Posts: 2434
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:34 pm

Re: DOJ Says Law Doesn’t Bar Transgender Discrimination

Post by Ph64 » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:21 pm

GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:

Do I think we should fire or refuse to employ people with any mental condition? That's about half of the current workforce that we know of.

It's not the employer's job or concern to determine mental health. If we're really depending on them to do so, then we are severely fucked.

I didn't say we should bar all people with mental illness from employment. Try to use the brain God gave you. Can you imagine situations in which a mental illness might render a person unacceptable for some position of employment?
Of course. But that's not the same thing as saying "nobody with this illness can work for me, because my feelz say so".

That would be no different than saying "colored need not apply".
I'd have absolutely no problem hiring you as a waiter for my restaurant, but 99.9% of my customers are white folk that aren't comfortable being served by blacks, so your application is rejected.

Its not my feelz, but my customers.

That work better? :roll:

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25279
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: DOJ Says Law Doesn’t Bar Transgender Discrimination

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:25 pm

Ph64 wrote:
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Speaker to Animals wrote:

I didn't say we should bar all people with mental illness from employment. Try to use the brain God gave you. Can you imagine situations in which a mental illness might render a person unacceptable for some position of employment?
Of course. But that's not the same thing as saying "nobody with this illness can work for me, because my feelz say so".

That would be no different than saying "colored need not apply".
I'd have absolutely no problem hiring you as a waiter for my restaurant, but 99.9% of my customers are white folk that aren't comfortable being served by blacks, so your application is rejected.

Its not my feelz, but my customers.

That work better? :roll:
Sure. Service industry revolves around presenting a nice image.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

Dand
Posts: 571
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 4:57 pm

Re: DOJ Says Law Doesn’t Bar Transgender Discrimination

Post by Dand » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:42 pm

Is the government going to force Hooters to have fat dudes as waiters?
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Dand wrote:Never heard of affirmative action?
Sure. It's a pathetic response to a problem that shouldn't exist.
We agree there but it does exist and ethnicity/sex are factors in employment. Being able to choose your ethnicity or sex really complicates that.

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25279
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: DOJ Says Law Doesn’t Bar Transgender Discrimination

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:44 pm

Dand wrote:Is the government going to force Hooters to have fat dudes as waiters?
GrumpyCatFace wrote:
Dand wrote:Never heard of affirmative action?
Sure. It's a pathetic response to a problem that shouldn't exist.
We agree there but it does exist and ethnicity/sex are factors in employment. Being able to choose your ethnicity or sex really complicates that.
Then this is another excellent reason to abolish Affirmative Action. Consensus reached!
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0